Suppr超能文献

卡维地洛与美托洛尔对糖尿病高血压患者血脂浓度的影响比较。

Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on serum lipid concentration in diabetic hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Bell D S H, Bakris G L, McGill J B

机构信息

The University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Mar;11(3):234-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00927.x. Epub 2008 Jun 17.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Vasoconstricting beta-blocker use is associated with a reduction in HDL cholesterol, higher triglyceride, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, whereas carvedilol, a vasodilating beta-blocker, has not been associated with these effects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare in a randomized, double-blind study, the effects of the beta 1-blocker metoprolol tartrate with the combined alpha 1, beta-blocker carvedilol on serum lipid concentrations.

METHODS

A prospective randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial compared the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on total cholesterol, triglycerides, calculated LDL, HDL and non-HDL cholesterol levels at baseline and after 5 months of therapy as a secondary objective in the Glycemic Effects in Diabetes Mellitus: Carvedilol-Metoprolol Comparison in Hypertensive (GEMINI) study. In this study, 1235 participants with type 2 diabetes and hypertension who were receiving renin-angiotensin system blockers were randomized either to carvedilol, receiving 6.25-25 mg twice daily, or to metoprolol tartrate, receiving 50-200 mg twice daily. If needed, hydrochlorothiazide and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker were added to achieve blood pressure goals.

RESULTS

In the metoprolol tartrate group, triglycerides and non-HDL cholesterol increased and both the LDL and the HDL cholesterol levels decreased. In the carvedilol group, total LDL and HDL cholesterol decreased, non-HDL cholesterol was unchanged and triglycerides increased. Comparing the carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate groups, there was no statistically significant difference in LDL and HDL cholesterol levels, but there was a significantly greater decreases with carvedilol in total cholesterol [-2.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.60 to -1.15, p < 0.001], triglycerides (-9.8%, 95% CI -13.7, -5.75%, p < 0.001) and non-HDL cholesterol (-4.03%, 95% CI -6.3 to -1.8, p < 0.0006). At the end of the study, significantly more participants in the metoprolol tartrate group had had initiation of statin therapy or the statin dose increased than those in the carvedilol group (11 vs. 32%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes currently receiving a renin-angiotensin blocker, compared with metoprolol tartrate, the addition of carvedilol for blood pressure control resulted in a significant decrease in triglyceride, total cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol levels. The use of metoprolol resulted in a significantly greater rate of initiation of statin therapy or an increase in the dose of existing statin therapy when compared with carvedilol utilization.

摘要

背景

使用血管收缩性β受体阻滞剂会导致高密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低、甘油三酯、总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平升高,而血管舒张性β受体阻滞剂卡维地洛则未出现这些影响。

目的

在一项随机、双盲研究中,比较β1受体阻滞剂酒石酸美托洛尔与α1、β受体联合阻滞剂卡维地洛对血脂浓度的影响。

方法

一项前瞻性随机、双盲、平行组试验,比较卡维地洛和美托洛尔对总胆固醇、甘油三酯、计算得出的低密度脂蛋白、高密度脂蛋白和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的影响,该试验作为糖尿病血糖影响:卡维地洛 - 美托洛尔高血压比较(GEMINI)研究的次要目标。在本研究中,1235名接受肾素 - 血管紧张素系统阻滞剂治疗的2型糖尿病和高血压患者被随机分为两组,一组接受卡维地洛,每日两次,每次6.25 - 25毫克;另一组接受酒石酸美托洛尔,每日两次,每次50 - 200毫克。如有需要,可添加氢氯噻嗪和二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂以达到血压目标。

结果

在酒石酸美托洛尔组中,甘油三酯和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高,低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平降低。在卡维地洛组中,总低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低,非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇无变化,甘油三酯升高。比较卡维地洛组和酒石酸美托洛尔组,低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平无统计学显著差异,但卡维地洛组的总胆固醇降幅更大[-2.9%,95%置信区间(CI)-4.60至-1.15,p < 0.001],甘油三酯降幅为(-9.8%,95% CI -13.7,-5.75%,p < 0.001),非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇降幅为(-4.03%,95% CI -6.3至-1.8,p < 0.0006)。在研究结束时,酒石酸美托洛尔组开始他汀类药物治疗或增加他汀类药物剂量的参与者显著多于卡维地洛组(11%对32%,p = 0.04)。

结论

在目前正在接受肾素 - 血管紧张素阻滞剂治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,与酒石酸美托洛尔相比,加用卡维地洛控制血压可显著降低甘油三酯、总胆固醇和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平。与使用卡维地洛相比,使用美托洛尔导致他汀类药物治疗开始率显著更高或现有他汀类药物治疗剂量增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验