Suppr超能文献

非惊厥性癫痫发作:为重症患者制定合理的诊断与管理方法。

Nonconvulsive seizures: developing a rational approach to the diagnosis and management in the critically ill population.

作者信息

Jirsch J, Hirsch L J

机构信息

Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;118(8):1660-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.312. Epub 2007 Jun 27.

Abstract

Originally described in patients with chronic epilepsy, nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) are being recognized with increasing frequency, both in ambulatory patients with cognitive change, and even more so in the critically ill. In fact, the majority of seizures that occur in the critically ill are nonconvulsive and can only be diagnosed with EEG monitoring. The semiology of NCSs and the associated EEG findings are quite variable. There are a number of periodic, rhythmic or stimulation-related EEG patterns in the critically ill of unclear significance and even less clear treatment implications. The field struggles to develop useful diagnostic criteria for NCSs, to standardize nomenclature for the numerous equivocal patterns, and to devise studies that will help determine which patterns should be treated and how aggressively. This review surveys the evidence for and against NCSs causing neuronal injury, and attempts to develop a rational approach to the diagnosis and management of these seizures, particularly in the encephalopathic population.

摘要

非惊厥性癫痫发作(NCSs)最初是在慢性癫痫患者中被描述的,现在其在认知功能改变的门诊患者中被越来越频繁地识别出来,在重症患者中更是如此。事实上,重症患者中发生的大多数癫痫发作都是非惊厥性的,只能通过脑电图监测来诊断。NCSs的症状学和相关的脑电图表现差异很大。在重症患者中,有许多周期性、节律性或与刺激相关的脑电图模式,其意义尚不清楚,治疗意义更不明确。该领域一直在努力制定有用的NCSs诊断标准,规范众多模糊模式的命名,并设计有助于确定哪些模式应接受治疗以及治疗强度的研究。这篇综述调查了支持和反对NCSs导致神经元损伤的证据,并试图制定一种合理的方法来诊断和管理这些癫痫发作,特别是在脑病患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验