Suppr超能文献

巴西葡萄牙语的时间压缩言语测试。

Time-compressed speech test in Brazilian Portuguese.

作者信息

Rabelo Camila Maia, Schochat Eliane

机构信息

Physiotherapy, Audiology and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007 Jun;62(3):261-72. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322007000300010.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The time-compressed speech test has existed since the 1970s. It is sensitive for evaluating auditory closure. However, it is not used in Brazil because until recently, it had not been developed in Portuguese.

PURPOSE

To develop a compressed speech test in Portuguese, to apply it to normal-hearing adults, and to verify which of the compressed lists (50%, 60%, or 70%) is the most appropriate to be part of a set of auditory processing tests.

METHODS

144 normal-hearing adults, distributed homogeneously between both genders, were assessed. The compressed speech tests were applied using monosyllables and disyllables according to 8 previously established sequences, and the results were compared with respect to the initial ear, to the order of presentation, and to the kind of test.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between ears. The 50%, 60% and 70% presentation order produced a better average of correct responses than the 70%, 60% and 50% one. There was a significant difference (P <.001) between the results of the tests comprising lists of monosyllables compared to those comprising disyllables. In both tests (with monosyllables and disyllables) the average of correct responses decreased as the compression increased.

CONCLUSION

The monosyllabic and disyllabic lists with 60% compression appeared to be more stable than the others, with the average of correct responses around 90%.

摘要

引言

时间压缩言语测试自20世纪70年代就已存在。它对评估听觉闭合很敏感。然而,它在巴西未被使用,因为直到最近,还没有葡萄牙语版本。

目的

开发葡萄牙语的压缩言语测试,将其应用于听力正常的成年人,并验证哪种压缩列表(50%、60%或70%)最适合作为一组听觉处理测试的一部分。

方法

评估了144名听力正常的成年人,男女均匀分布。根据8个先前确定的序列,使用单音节和双音节进行压缩言语测试,并就起始耳、呈现顺序和测试类型比较结果。

结果

两耳之间无显著差异。50%、60%和70%的呈现顺序比70%、60%和50%的呈现顺序产生了更好的正确反应平均值。与包含双音节列表的测试结果相比,包含单音节列表的测试结果存在显著差异(P <.001)。在两项测试(单音节和双音节)中,随着压缩率增加,正确反应平均值均下降。

结论

压缩率为60%的单音节和双音节列表似乎比其他列表更稳定,正确反应平均值约为90%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验