Exter M, Winkler A, Holube I
Institut für Hörtechnik und Audiologie, Jade Hochschule und Exzellenzcluster "Hearing4All", Ofener Str. 16/19, 26121, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):557-63. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0185-z.
ISO 8253-3 [4] describes the requirements for speech tests with respect to their phonemic balance. The fulfillment of these requirements by the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test were examined.
The Freiburg monosyllables were phonologically transcribed and analyzed with respect to their structural types, vowels and consonants, as well as phonological classes, and compared to reference values.
The phonemic distribution of the Freiburg monosyllables differs slightly from the reference values for the German language. The differences are presumably related to the restriction to monosyllabic substantives. Most test lists (except for 12) contain similar proportions of different phonem classes for vowel and consonants according to Hahlbrock and ISO 8253-3 [4].
The deviations of test lists 5, 11, and 15 in a study for perceptual equivalence cannot be explained by phonemic imbalance in comparison to other test lists. Only the lower recognition rates for test list 12 might be explained by its deviant phonemic distribution.
ISO 8253-3 [4]描述了言语测试在音素平衡方面的要求。本研究考察了弗莱堡单音节言语测试对这些要求的满足情况。
对弗莱堡单音节词进行音系转录，并分析其结构类型、元音和辅音以及音类，然后与参考值进行比较。
弗莱堡单音节词的音素分布与德语参考值略有不同。这些差异可能与对单音节实词的限制有关。根据哈尔布罗克和ISO 8253-3 [4]的标准，大多数测试列表（除了12号）中元音和辅音的不同音类比例相似。
在一项感知等效性研究中，测试列表5、11和15的偏差与其他测试列表相比，不能用音素不平衡来解释。只有测试列表12的较低识别率可能是由其异常的音素分布所导致的。
