Chriqui Jamie F, Terry-McElrath Yvonne, McBride Duane C, Eidson Shelby Smith, VanderWaal Curtis J
Center for Health Policy and Legislative Analysis, The MayaTech Corporation, 1100 Wayne Avenue, Suite 900, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul;34(3):309-28. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9069-z. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
In the United States, state governments legally authorize outpatient substance abuse treatment programs. In some states, programs are certified or accredited (ideal standards). Other states license programs (minimal standards). Additionally, some states authorize programs through "deemed status", which is afforded to programs attaining accreditation from a national accrediting body. Primary legal research and the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services' (N-SSATS) data were used to examine the relationships between state authorization type (certification/accreditation vs licensure with and without deemed status) and outpatient treatment program practices. Programs in certification/accreditation (vs licensure) states had significantly higher odds of offering wrap-around and continuing care/after care services associated with better long-term treatment outcome. Programs in states that allowed for certification/accreditation with deemed status had significantly lower odds of infectious disease testing, but higher odds of providing group and family counseling. Results suggest that state authorization type may impact services offered by outpatient treatment programs.
在美国,州政府依法授权门诊药物滥用治疗项目。在一些州,项目获得认证或认可(理想标准)。其他州则对项目进行许可(最低标准)。此外,一些州通过“视同地位”授权项目,即授予获得国家认可机构认可的项目。主要法律研究以及药物滥用治疗服务全国调查(N - SSATS)的数据被用于研究州授权类型(认证/认可与有或没有视同地位的许可)与门诊治疗项目实践之间的关系。认证/认可(相对于许可)州的项目提供与更好的长期治疗结果相关的综合服务和持续护理/后续护理服务的几率显著更高。允许通过视同地位进行认证/认可的州的项目进行传染病检测的几率显著更低,但提供团体和家庭咨询的几率更高。结果表明,州授权类型可能会影响门诊治疗项目提供的服务。