Suppr超能文献

运用政策和采购杠杆以增加循证实践在社区药物滥用治疗场所的应用:来自单一州政府机构的报告

Employing policy and purchasing levers to increase the use of evidence-based practices in community-based substance abuse treatment settings: reports from single state authorities.

作者信息

Rieckmann Traci R, Kovas Anne E, Cassidy Elaine F, McCarty Dennis

机构信息

Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, United States.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2011 Nov;34(4):366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

Abstract

State public health authorities are critical to the successful implementation of science based addiction treatment practices by community-based providers. The literature to date, however, lacks examples of state level policy strategies that promote evidence-based practices (EBPs). This mixed-methods study documents changes in two critical state-to-provider strategies aimed at accelerating use of evidence-based practices: purchasing levers (financial incentives and mechanisms) and policy or regulatory levers. A sample of 51 state representatives was interviewed. Single State Authorities for substance abuse treatment (SSAs) that fund providers directly or through managed care were significantly more likely to have contracts that required or encouraged evidence-based interventions, as compared to SSAs that fund providers indirectly through sub-state entities. Policy levers included EBP-related legislation, language in rules and regulations, and evidence-based criteria in state plans and standards. These differences in state policy are likely to result in significant state level variations regarding both the extent to which EBPs are implemented by community-based treatment providers and the quality of implementation.

摘要

州公共卫生当局对于社区服务提供者成功实施基于科学的成瘾治疗实践至关重要。然而,迄今为止的文献缺乏促进循证实践(EBPs)的州级政策策略实例。这项混合方法研究记录了旨在加速循证实践应用的两种关键的州对提供者策略的变化:采购杠杆(经济激励措施和机制)以及政策或监管杠杆。对51名州代表进行了访谈。与通过州以下实体间接资助提供者的单一州药物滥用治疗管理局(SSAs)相比,直接或通过管理式医疗资助提供者的SSAs更有可能签订要求或鼓励循证干预措施的合同。政策杠杆包括与循证实践相关的立法、规章制度中的措辞以及州计划和标准中的循证标准。州政策的这些差异可能会导致州一级在社区治疗提供者实施循证实践的程度以及实施质量方面出现显著差异。

相似文献

10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
A community planning process for the implementation of evidence-based practice.
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
3
Understanding evidence-based public health policy.理解循证公共卫生政策。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1576-83. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156224. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
4
The State Health Authority Yardstick (SHAY).国家卫生管理局标准(SHAY)
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Jun;45(3):228-36. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9181-z. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
10
Blending addiction research and practice: strategies for technology transfer.融合成瘾研究与实践:技术转移策略
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Sep;35(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.09.004. Epub 2008 Mar 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验