Linden David E J
School of Psychology, University of Wales Bangor, Bangor, Wales, UK.
Rev Neurosci. 2007;18(2):159-71. doi: 10.1515/revneuro.2007.18.2.159.
Most models of information processing in the brain assume that cognitive tasks can be broken down into components that are solved in sequential steps, from perception through a number of cognitive comparisons (e.g., memory) or transformations (e.g., language) to the preparation and execution of a motor response. The relative and absolute timing of these stages and the degree to which they occur parallel or in serial order has traditionally been investigated with behavioural methods, mainly reaction times. This classical mental chronometry has over the past decades been complemented with neurophysiological approaches, using event-related potentials (ERPs), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This review highlights the contributions and limitations of these techniques and focuses on recent advances in the combination of ERPs and fMRI to elucidate working memory and number processing. It will be argued that similar design principles as established for behavioural studies of mental chronometry should apply to neurophysiological investigations as well.
大脑中大多数信息处理模型都假定,认知任务可分解为多个组成部分,这些部分按顺序步骤解决,从感知开始,经过一系列认知比较(如记忆)或转换(如语言),直至运动反应的准备与执行。传统上,这些阶段的相对和绝对时间安排以及它们并行或串行发生的程度,主要通过行为方法,即反应时间来研究。在过去几十年中,这种经典的心理计时法已通过神经生理学方法得到补充,这些方法包括事件相关电位(ERP)、功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和经颅磁刺激(TMS)。本综述强调了这些技术的贡献与局限性,并聚焦于ERP和fMRI相结合在阐明工作记忆和数字处理方面的最新进展。有人认为,为心理计时行为研究确立的类似设计原则也应适用于神经生理学研究。