Lee Jae Whan, Jung Jin Young, Kim Yong Bae, Huh Seung Kon, Kim Dong Ik, Lee Kyu Chang
Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120- 752, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2007 Jun 30;48(3):425-32. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.3.425.
Pathogenesis and treatment of spontaneous dissecting aneurysm of the intracranial vertebral artery (VA) remain controversial. This study was designed to provide management strategies and to improve management outcome in patients with these aneurysms.
Among a total of 1,990 patients treated for intracranial aneurysms from February 1992 to June 2005, 28 patients (1.4%) were treated either by surgery (8 patients) or neurointervention (20 patients) for spontaneous dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial VA. Twenty-two patients had ruptured aneurysms. We analyzed indications of surgery or neurointervention for each case, and assessed the management outcome at a 6-month follow-up.
For selection of therapeutic options, patients were initially evaluated as possible candidates for neurointervention using the following criteria: 1) poor clinical grade; 2) advanced age; 3) medical illness; 4) unruptured aneurysm; 5) equal or larger opposite VA; 6) anticipated surgical difficulty due to a deep location of the VA-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) junction. Surgery was considered for patients with: 1) high-risk aneurysms (large or irregular shaped); 2) smaller opposite VA; 3) failed neurointervention; or 4) dissection involving the PICA. Management outcomes were favorable in 25 patients (89.3%). Causes of unfavorable outcome in the remaining 3 patients were the initial insult in 2 patients, and medical complications in one patient.
Ruptured aneurysms must be treated to prevent rebleeding. For unruptured aneurysms, follow-up angiography would be necessary to detect growth of the aneurysm. Treatment modality should be selected according to the clinical characteristics of each patient and close collaboration between neurosurgeons and neurointerventionists is essential.
颅内椎动脉自发性夹层动脉瘤的发病机制及治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在为这些动脉瘤患者提供管理策略并改善管理效果。
在1992年2月至2005年6月期间接受颅内动脉瘤治疗的1990例患者中,28例(1.4%)因颅内椎动脉自发性夹层动脉瘤接受了手术治疗(8例)或神经介入治疗(20例)。22例患者的动脉瘤破裂。我们分析了每例患者手术或神经介入的指征,并在6个月随访时评估了管理效果。
对于治疗方案的选择,最初根据以下标准将患者评估为神经介入的可能候选者:1)临床分级差;2)年龄较大;3)内科疾病;4)未破裂动脉瘤;5)对侧椎动脉相等或更大;6)由于椎动脉-小脑后下动脉(PICA)交界处位置深预计手术困难。对于以下患者考虑手术治疗:1)高危动脉瘤(大或形状不规则);2)对侧椎动脉较小;3)神经介入失败;或4)夹层累及PICA。25例患者(89.3%)的管理效果良好。其余3例患者预后不良的原因是2例患者为初始损伤,1例患者为内科并发症。
必须治疗破裂的动脉瘤以防止再出血。对于未破裂的动脉瘤,有必要进行随访血管造影以检测动脉瘤的生长。应根据每位患者的临床特征选择治疗方式,神经外科医生和神经介入医生之间的密切合作至关重要。