Suppr超能文献

哪些机械和物理测试方法与预测陶瓷基牙科修复体的临床性能相关?

Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?

作者信息

Anusavice K J, Kakar Kunjan, Ferree N

机构信息

College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:218-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01460.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The survival and performance of clinical prostheses with a ceramic component are probabilistic in nature. Only under very rare circumstances will all of the prostheses in a group exhibit either 100% successes or 100% failures over a period of 5 years or more. Prosthesis failure may be defined as any condition that leads to replacement. These conditions include secondary caries, irreversible pulpitis, excessive wear of opposing tooth surfaces, excessive erosion and roughening of the ceramic surface, ditching of the cement margin, unacceptable esthetics, cracking, chipping and fracture. A systematic review of the dental literature was performed to determine the extent to which the mechanical and physical properties of dental alloys and ceramics can predict the 5-year clinical performance of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) and to determine the associated quality of reported outcomes associated with these clinical studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review was based on clinical research studies of 5 years or greater duration that were published in English dental journals between 1980 and 2006 using the following key words and MeSH terms. Our search strategy was as follows: Search 1: Partial fixed denture OR denture, partial, fixed OR denture, partial fixed OR dental porcelain OR metal ceramic alloys OR dental ceramic Search 2: Prosthesis failure OR dental restoration failure OR time factors OR survival analysis Search 3: Meta-analysis OR evaluation studies OR review OR clinical trial OR comparative study OR follow-up studies OR prospective studies OR clinical follow-up study OR clinical trial OR longitudinal studies Inclusion of searches 1, 2 and 3 and limits placed on the publication date starting on January 1, 1980, English language, and clinical studies involving humans resulted in a total of 684 articles. By restricting the clinical studies to 5 years or more in duration, the number was reduced to 193. By eliminating resin-bonded FDPs, cantilever designs, implant-supported prostheses, crowns, inlay- or onlay-supported prostheses, a total of 37 articles remained for detailed review. After excluding review articles and articles involving resin-bonded bridges, single-author clinical research articles, cantilever designs and implant-supported FDPs, 11 clinical research articles remained. For these articles, it was not possible to determine conclusively the probability of failure for three-unit FDPs compared with four-unit and larger prostheses or the location of the crowns and pontics.

RESULTS

This systematic review of studies on ceramic-based FDPs confirms the results of previous studies that, in most cases, less than 15% of these prostheses were removed or were in need of replacement at 10 years. However, there was considerable variability in the number of parameters that were reported as well as the range of details on failures that occurred. In some studies, a standardized evaluation system was used in which USPHS or Ryge criteria were applied. However, there was also great uncertainty in the definition of failure with respect to repairable fractures and whether the identified causative factors were directly or indirectly associated with the replacement of the prostheses.

CONCLUSIONS

This review indicates that there is no single in vitro test variable that can predict clinical performance in these prostheses. Based on these reviews, there is an urgent need to develop a comprehensive classification system for identifying clinical prosthesis failures, technical complications and biologic complications. Guidelines on the retrieval of fractured prostheses and/or impressions that capture the fracture surface details should also be developed. The predictive power of in vitro data can be increased by finite element stress analysis and computer programs such as the CARES/Life software (NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH) that estimates the time-dependent nature of ceramic structure survival.

摘要

目的

带有陶瓷部件的临床修复体的存活情况和性能本质上具有概率性。只有在非常罕见的情况下,一组修复体在5年或更长时间内才会全部呈现100%成功或100%失败。修复体失败可定义为导致进行更换的任何情况。这些情况包括继发龋、不可逆性牙髓炎、对颌牙面过度磨损、陶瓷表面过度侵蚀和粗糙、粘结剂边缘沟痕、美学效果不佳、开裂、崩瓷和折断。对牙科文献进行了系统评价,以确定牙科合金和陶瓷的机械及物理性能在多大程度上能够预测金属烤瓷和全瓷固定义齿(FDP)的5年临床性能,并确定与这些临床研究相关的报告结果的质量。

材料与方法

该评价基于1980年至2006年间发表在英文牙科期刊上、为期5年或更长时间的临床研究,使用了以下关键词和医学主题词。我们的检索策略如下:检索1:部分固定义齿或局部固定义齿或局部固定假牙或牙科烤瓷或金属烤瓷合金或牙科陶瓷;检索2:修复体失败或牙齿修复失败或时间因素或生存分析;检索3:荟萃分析或评估研究或综述或临床试验或比较研究或随访研究或前瞻性研究或临床随访研究或临床试验或纵向研究。纳入检索1、2和3,并对1980年1月1日开始的出版日期、英文以及涉及人类的临床研究进行限制,共得到684篇文章。将临床研究限制为持续时间5年或更长时间后,数量减少至193篇。通过排除树脂粘结FDP、悬臂设计、种植体支持的修复体、冠、嵌体或高嵌体支持的修复体,共剩下37篇文章进行详细评价。在排除综述文章以及涉及树脂粘结桥、单作者临床研究文章、悬臂设计和种植体支持的FDP的文章后,剩下11篇临床研究文章。对于这些文章,无法最终确定与四单位及更大修复体相比,三单位FDP的失败概率,也无法确定冠和桥体的位置。

结果

对基于陶瓷的FDP研究的这一系统评价证实了先前研究的结果,即在大多数情况下,这些修复体在10年时不到15%被移除或需要更换。然而,报告的参数数量以及发生失败的详细情况范围存在相当大的差异。在一些研究中,使用了标准化评估系统,应用了美国公共卫生署(USPHS)或赖格(Ryge)标准。然而,关于可修复骨折的失败定义以及所确定的致病因素与修复体更换是直接还是间接相关方面,也存在很大的不确定性。

结论

该评价表明,没有单一的体外测试变量能够预测这些修复体的临床性能。基于这些评价,迫切需要制定一个综合分类系统,用于识别临床修复体失败、技术并发症和生物并发症。还应制定关于获取骨折修复体和/或捕捉骨折表面细节的印模的指南。通过有限元应力分析和诸如CARES/Life软件(美国国家航空航天局刘易斯研究中心,俄亥俄州克利夫兰)等计算机程序,可以提高体外数据的预测能力,该软件可估计陶瓷结构存活的时间依赖性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验