Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较研究。

A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Jaturasrivilai Prasong

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uttaradit Hospital, Uttaradit 53000, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 May;90(5):837-43.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficiency of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) MATERIAL AND METHOD: Medical records of 50 cases of LA VH and 50 cases of TAH were reviewed from January 2004 to December 2004

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in basic clinical characteristics. Myoma uteri was the major cause of operation. The operative time (115.9 +/- 40.8 min vs. 68.2 +/-14.2 min), the operative cost (26,763.48 +/- 2, 718.37 Baht vs. 22,345.50 +/- 4,057.40 Baht), diclofenac for postoperative analgesics (135.0 +/- 67.5 mg vs. 300.0 +/- 75.0 mg), the postoperative hospital stay (2.6 +/- 0.9 days vs. 4.5 +/- 1.1 days), and the time to return to work (30.4 + 3.1 days vs. 50.9 +/- 6.6 days) were significantly different in the LA VH group compared to the TAH group. There was no significant difference in blood loss between the two groups. The mean score of recovery scale for LAVH was 9 and 7 for TAH at the 28th day ofpost-op. There was one bladder injury in the LAVH group. The common complications in both groups were hemorrhage andfebrile morbidity. The learning curve of LA VHprocedure showed that operative time was significantly different between the 30th and 40th cases (122.0 +/- 31.8 min vs. 91.0 +/- 26.5 min). Doing LAVH with condition of uterine weight will not effect the operative time and blood loss.

CONCLUSION

LAVH is less painful, has a shorter length of hospital stay and quicker return to work than TAH. Moreover LAVH does not increase intra- or postoperative complications. LAVH is another alternative choice to treat myoma uteri in a well trained operator

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)和经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)的效率。

材料与方法

回顾2004年1月至2004年12月期间50例行LAVH和50例行TAH患者的病历。

结果

两组患者的基本临床特征无显著差异。子宫肌瘤是主要手术原因。LAVH组与TAH组相比,手术时间(115.9±40.8分钟对68.2±14.2分钟)、手术费用(26,763.48±2,718.37泰铢对22,345.50±4,057.40泰铢)、术后用于镇痛的双氯芬酸用量(135.0±67.5毫克对300.0±75.0毫克)、术后住院时间(2.6±0.9天对4.5±1.1天)以及恢复工作时间(30.4±3.1天对50.9±6.6天)均有显著差异。两组患者的失血量无显著差异。术后第28天,LAVH恢复量表的平均得分是9分,TAH是7分。LAVH组有1例膀胱损伤。两组常见的并发症均为出血和发热性疾病。LAVH手术的学习曲线显示,第30例和第40例手术时间有显著差异(122.0±31.8分钟对91.0±26.5分钟)。在子宫重量条件下进行LAVH不会影响手术时间和失血量。

结论

与TAH相比,LAVH疼痛较轻,住院时间较短,恢复工作较快。此外,LAVH不会增加术中或术后并发症。对于训练有素的手术者,LAVH是治疗子宫肌瘤的另一种选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验