• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫切除术。次全子宫切除术与辅助阴道子宫切除术的比较

Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.

作者信息

Schwartz R O

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Atlanta.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1994 Aug;39(8):625-30.

PMID:7996527
Abstract

Twenty cases of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy performed by operative laparoscopy without vaginal assistance were retrospectively compared to 232 cases of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy reported in the literature. The specimens were morcellated intraabdominally and removed through the umbilicus. This is the first reported series of this technique with intraabdominal morcellation, which emphasizes cosmetic considerations and remains within the confines of the umbilicus. The postoperative hospitalization time ranged from 3.75 to 22.2 hours. On the second postoperative day, 10% of the patients returned to work, and 15% were able to drive. Patients resumed normal activity in an average of 5.6 days after surgery. As compared to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, there was a decrease in morbidity, blood loss and recovery time. Prolonged anesthesia from the longer operating time was clinically insignificant in terms of the patients' recovery. By decreasing the disability from hysterectomy from six weeks to one, the procedure provided financial savings through work time gained.

摘要

对20例通过腹腔镜手术且无阴道辅助进行的腹腔镜子宫次全切除术病例进行回顾性分析,并与文献报道的232例腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术病例进行比较。标本在腹腔内切碎,经脐部取出。这是首次报道的采用腹腔内切碎技术的系列病例,该技术强调美观因素且切口局限于脐部。术后住院时间为3.75至22.2小时。术后第二天,10%的患者恢复工作,15%的患者能够开车。患者术后平均5.6天恢复正常活动。与腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术相比,发病率、失血量和恢复时间均有所降低。较长手术时间导致的麻醉时间延长,对患者恢复而言在临床上无显著影响。通过将子宫切除术后的残疾时间从六周缩短至一周,该手术通过节省工作时间带来了经济收益。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.腹腔镜子宫切除术。次全子宫切除术与辅助阴道子宫切除术的比较
J Reprod Med. 1994 Aug;39(8):625-30.
2
A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.腹腔镜次全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术效果的比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.019.
3
A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 May;90(5):837-43.
4
Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.腹腔镜子宫切除术:凯撒医疗集团圣地亚哥分院的经验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.022.
5
Comparative analysis of different laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.不同腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 May;285(5):1353-61. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2140-2. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
6
Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术对比
J Reprod Med. 1992 Mar;37(3):247-50.
7
A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.前瞻性随机比较经阴道子宫切除术、腹腔镜辅助经阴道子宫切除术和全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性子宫疾病的女性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Feb;148(2):172-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.019. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
8
Individual physician experience with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in a single outpatient setting.在单一门诊环境中,个别医生进行腹腔镜次全子宫切除术的经验。
Surg Innov. 2007 Jun;14(2):102-6. doi: 10.1177/1553350607303785.
9
Experience with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uterus.腹腔镜辅助下经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫增大的经验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Sep;280(3):425-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-0944-0. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
10
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. A suitable substitute for abdominal hysterectomy?腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术。它是腹式子宫切除术的合适替代方法吗?
J Reprod Med. 2000 Sep;45(9):738-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative patient satisfaction after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.腹腔镜次全子宫切除术后患者的满意度
JSLS. 2013 Jan-Mar;17(1):107-10. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13517013318067.
2
A prospective, randomized clinical comparison between UltraCision and the novel sealing and cutting device BiCision in patients with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.一项在腹腔镜下子宫次全切除术患者中,对超声刀与新型的封闭切割装置 B i Cision 行前瞻性、随机临床对比的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3852-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2994-4. Epub 2013 May 14.