Suppr超能文献

精神病风险队列中暴力行为的纵向研究。

A Longitudinal Study of Violent Behavior in a Psychosis-Risk Cohort.

机构信息

The New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jan;43(2):264-271. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.151. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

Abstract

There is a lack of insight into the relationships between violent ideation, violent behavior, and early, particularly attenuated, psychosis. Our aims were to examine the relationships between baseline violent behavior and violent ideation and outcome violent behavior and conversion to psychosis in at-risk individuals. We longitudinally assessed 200 individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis for violent ideation and violent behavior using the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS), and rated these according to MacArthur Community Violence categories. Fifty-six individuals (28%) reported violent ideation at baseline, 12 (6%) reported violent behavior within 6 months pre-baseline, and 8 (4%) committed acts of violence during the follow-up time period. Information about violent ideation was obtained only by indirect, but not direct, inquiry about violent ideation. Both violent ideation and violent behavior at baseline significantly predicted violent behavior (RR=13.9, p=0.001; RR=8.3, p=0.003, respectively) during follow-up, as well as a diagnosis of psychosis (RR=2.3 and 2.4, respectively; both p<0.001), independent of more than 40 clinical and demographic variables. The targets of the subjects' violent ideation at baseline were completely different than their subsequent targets of violent behavior. Violent behavior occurred within 7 days (SD 35 days) of a diagnosis of syndromal psychosis. These data suggest that checking carefully for violent ideation and behavior in clinical high-risk patients is essential, as these have predictive value for conversion to psychosis and likelihood of violence in the future.

摘要

人们对于暴力观念、暴力行为,以及早期、特别是减弱的精神病之间的关系缺乏深入了解。我们的目的是检验处于精神病高危状态的个体中,基线时的暴力行为和暴力观念与预后的暴力行为和精神病转化之间的关系。我们使用精神病风险综合征结构化访谈(SIPS),对 200 名处于精神病高危状态的个体进行了暴力观念和暴力行为的纵向评估,并根据麦克阿瑟社区暴力类别对这些个体进行了评级。56 名个体(28%)在基线时有暴力观念,12 名个体(6%)在基线前 6 个月内有暴力行为,8 名个体(4%)在随访期间实施了暴力行为。关于暴力观念的信息仅通过间接而非直接询问暴力观念获得。基线时的暴力观念和暴力行为均显著预测随访期间的暴力行为(RR=13.9,p=0.001;RR=8.3,p=0.003),以及精神病的诊断(RR=2.3 和 2.4;均 p<0.001),独立于 40 多个临床和人口统计学变量。个体基线时暴力观念的目标与随后的暴力行为的目标完全不同。暴力行为发生在综合征精神病诊断后的 7 天内(SD 为 35 天)。这些数据表明,在临床高危患者中仔细检查暴力观念和行为至关重要,因为这些因素对精神病转化和未来发生暴力行为的可能性具有预测价值。

相似文献

1
A Longitudinal Study of Violent Behavior in a Psychosis-Risk Cohort.精神病风险队列中暴力行为的纵向研究。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jan;43(2):264-271. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.151. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
3
Amygdalar volume and violent ideation in a sample at clinical high-risk for psychosis.杏仁核体积与精神病高危人群的暴力观念。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2019 May 30;287:60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

8
Violence risk assessment for young adults receiving treatment for early psychosis.青少年精神病早期治疗患者的暴力风险评估。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;76:101701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101701. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
Forensic Psychiatry: Focus on Malpractice and Risk Management.法医精神病学:关注医疗事故与风险管理。
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2019 Oct;17(4):391. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.17405. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

2
Suicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation.自杀、自杀未遂和自杀意念。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:307-30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验