Suppr超能文献

基于社区的参与性研究原则对美国印第安社区参与健康研究可能性的影响。

The influence of community-based participatory research principles on the likelihood of participation in health research in American Indian communities.

作者信息

Noe Tim D, Manson Spero M, Croy Calvin, McGough Helen, Henderson Jeffrey A, Buchwald Dedra S

机构信息

University of Colorado Health Science Center, American Indian and Alaska Native Programs, Aurora, CO 80045-0508, USA.

出版信息

Ethn Dis. 2007 Winter;17(1 Suppl 1):S6-14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Advocates of community-based participatory research (CBPR) have emphasized the need for such efforts to be collaborative, and close partnerships with the communities of interest are strongly recommended in developing study designs. However, to date, no systematic, empiric inquiry has been made into whether CBPR principles might influence an individual's decision to participate in research.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using vignettes that described various types of research, we surveyed 1066 American Indian students from three tribal colleges/universities to ascertain the extent to which respondent age, gender, education, cultural affiliation, tribal status, and prior experience with research may interact with the implementation of critical CBPR principles to increase or decrease the likelihood of participating in health research.

RESULTS

Many factors significantly increased odds of participation and included the study's being conducted by a tribal college/university or national organization, involving the community in study development, an American Indian's leading the study, addressing serious health problems of concern to the community, bringing money into the community, providing new treatments or services, compensation, anonymity, and using the information to answer new questions. Decreased odds of participation were related to possible discrimination against one's family, tribe, or racial group; lack of confidentiality; and possible physical harm.

CONCLUSIONS

Employing CBPR principles such as community involvement in all phases of the research, considering the potential benefits of the research, building on strengths and resources within the community and considering how results will be used is essential to conceptualizing, designing, and implementing successful health research in partnership with American Indians.

摘要

目的

基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)的倡导者强调此类工作需要具有协作性,并且强烈建议在制定研究设计时与相关社区建立紧密的伙伴关系。然而,迄今为止,尚未对CBPR原则是否会影响个人参与研究的决定进行系统的实证调查。

设计、背景和参与者:我们使用描述各种研究类型的 vignettes,对来自三所部落学院/大学的1066名美国印第安学生进行了调查,以确定受访者的年龄、性别、教育程度、文化归属、部落身份和先前的研究经验在多大程度上可能与关键CBPR原则的实施相互作用,从而增加或降低参与健康研究的可能性。

结果

许多因素显著增加了参与的几率,包括研究由部落学院/大学或国家组织进行、社区参与研究开发、由美国印第安人领导研究、解决社区关注的严重健康问题、为社区带来资金、提供新的治疗方法或服务、补偿、匿名以及利用信息回答新问题。参与几率降低与可能对个人家庭、部落或种族群体的歧视、缺乏保密性以及可能的身体伤害有关。

结论

采用CBPR原则,如让社区参与研究的各个阶段、考虑研究的潜在益处、利用社区内的优势和资源以及考虑研究结果的使用方式,对于与美国印第安人合作构思、设计和实施成功的健康研究至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验