• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[两种支气管激发试验(使用乙酰甲胆碱和高渗盐水)在哮喘患者支气管高反应性评估中的敏感性和特异性比较]

[Comparison of sensitivity and specifity of two bronchial provocation tests with methacholine and hypertonic saline in bronchial hyperreactivity evaluation in asthmatics].

作者信息

Piotrowska Teresa, Siergiejko Grzegorz, Siergiejko Zenon

机构信息

Akademia Medyczna w Białymstoku, Zakład Alergologii Dzieciecej.

出版信息

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Feb;22(128):126-9.

PMID:17598657
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Bronchial hyperreactivity, a inseparable feature of asthma in polish asthmatics is seldom evaluated. Its depends on at least two causes i.e. a lack of methacholine registration for BPT and an opinion, that challenge test can be harmful or dangerous for patients. That situation could correct wider prevalence of bronchial provocation test with hypertonic saline. To perform the test are needed: spirometer, ultrasonic nebuliser and hypertonic saline. The aim of the study was to compare sensitivity and specifity of both tests with methacholine and hypertonic saline.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Studies were carried out on a group of 79 subjects, where was 59 asthmatics and 20 healthy subjects (control group). Sensitivity and specifity of both tests were evaluated for a few different thresholds considered as a positive result. Usually a 20% decrease of FEV1 from baseline was considered as positive test result. Three different thresholds were considered for methacholine test i.e. PC20FEV1 = 8,0 or 16,0 or 32,0 mg/ml. Relative to BPT with hypertonic saline maximal inhalation time was constant, i.e. 930s, but different decreases in FEV1 (15% or 20% from baseline) were needed.

RESULTS

The most comparable sensitivity and specifity of the both tests were following, for methacholine threshold = PC20FEV1 = 16 mg/ ml, and for 4,5% NaCl PT15FEV1 = 930s.

CONCLUSION

Although BPT with hypertonic saline is less sensitive than methacholine challenge, it seems to be a good tool to evaluate of bronchial hyperreactivity and should be more often applied.

摘要

未标注

支气管高反应性是波兰哮喘患者哮喘不可分割的特征,但很少进行评估。这至少取决于两个原因,即缺乏用于支气管激发试验(BPT)的乙酰甲胆碱以及认为激发试验对患者可能有害或危险的观点。这种情况可以通过更广泛地使用高渗盐水进行支气管激发试验来纠正。进行该试验需要:肺活量计、超声雾化器和高渗盐水。本研究的目的是比较乙酰甲胆碱和高渗盐水两种试验的敏感性和特异性。

材料与方法

对一组79名受试者进行了研究,其中59名哮喘患者和20名健康受试者(对照组)。针对几个不同的被视为阳性结果的阈值评估了两种试验的敏感性和特异性。通常将第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)较基线下降20%视为阳性试验结果。对于乙酰甲胆碱试验考虑了三个不同的阈值,即PC20FEV1 = 8.0或16.0或32.0毫克/毫升。相对于高渗盐水支气管激发试验,最大吸入时间是恒定的,即930秒,但FEV1需要不同程度的下降(较基线下降15%或20%)。

结果

两种试验最具可比性的敏感性和特异性如下,乙酰甲胆碱阈值为PC20FEV1 = 16毫克/毫升,4.5%氯化钠激发试验PT15FEV1 = 930秒时。

结论

尽管高渗盐水支气管激发试验比乙酰甲胆碱激发试验敏感性低,但它似乎是评估支气管高反应性的一个好工具,应该更频繁地应用。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of sensitivity and specifity of two bronchial provocation tests with methacholine and hypertonic saline in bronchial hyperreactivity evaluation in asthmatics].[两种支气管激发试验(使用乙酰甲胆碱和高渗盐水)在哮喘患者支气管高反应性评估中的敏感性和特异性比较]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Feb;22(128):126-9.
2
The safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol as a bronchial provocation test for airway hyperresponsiveness: a phase 3 comparison study with hypertonic (4.5%) saline.吸入性干粉甘露醇作为气道高反应性支气管激发试验的安全性和有效性:与高渗(4.5%)盐水的3期对比研究。
Respir Res. 2005 Dec 9;6(1):144. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-144.
3
Comparison between hypertonic and isotonic saline-induced sputum in the evaluation of airway inflammation in subjects with moderate asthma.高渗盐水与等渗盐水诱导痰液在中度哮喘患者气道炎症评估中的比较。
Clin Exp Allergy. 1996 Dec;26(12):1395-400.
4
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to hypertonic saline challenge in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年对高渗盐水激发试验的支气管高反应性
J Bras Pneumol. 2006 May-Jun;32(3):195-201.
5
The use of mouth occlusion pressure to evaluate the effect of an initial inhalation of nebulized saline in methacholine challenge.使用口腔闭合压评估雾化盐水初次吸入在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中的效果。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 May-Jun;24(3):125-8.
6
[Ultrasonically nebulized hypertonic saline as a provocation agent in asthmatics].[超声雾化高渗盐水作为哮喘激发剂]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 1991 Apr;14(2):98-100, 128.
7
[Peculiarities of cell reception in bronchial asthma patients with bronchial hyperreactivity to hyperosmolar provocation].
Ter Arkh. 2000;72(1):63-5.
8
Methacholine dry powder inhaler as a new tool for bronchial challenge test.乙酰甲胆碱干粉吸入器作为支气管激发试验的新工具。
Int J Pharm. 2008 Mar 20;352(1-2):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.10.025. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
9
Inhalational challenge using hypertonic saline in asthmatic subjects: a comparison with responses to hyperpnoea, methacholine and water.哮喘患者使用高渗盐水进行吸入激发试验:与对深呼吸、乙酰甲胆碱和水的反应比较
Eur Respir J. 1990 Feb;3(2):144-51.
10
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation.肺移植后的支气管高反应性和闭塞性细支气管炎综合征
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Apr;24(4):489-92. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.02.006.