Nee Derek Evan, Wager Tor D, Jonides John
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1043, USA.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):1-17. doi: 10.3758/cabn.7.1.1.
A quantitative meta-analysis was performed on 47 neuroimaging studies involving tasks purported to require the resolution of interference. The tasks included the Stroop, flanker, go/no-go, stimulus-response compatibility, Simon, and stop signal tasks. Peak density-based analyses of these combined tasks reveal that the anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, posterior parietal cortex, and anterior insula may be important sites for the detection and/or resolution of interference. Individual task analyses reveal differential patterns of activation among the tasks. We propose that the drawing of distinctions among the processing stages at which interference may be resolved may explain regional activation differences. Our analyses suggest that resolution processes acting upon stimulus encoding, response selection, and response execution may recruit different neural regions.
对47项神经影像学研究进行了定量荟萃分析，这些研究涉及据称需要解决干扰的任务。这些任务包括斯特鲁普任务、侧翼任务、停止-信号任务、刺激-反应相容性任务、西蒙任务和停止信号任务。对这些组合任务进行基于峰值密度的分析发现，前扣带回皮质、背外侧前额叶皮质、额下回、顶叶后皮质和前脑岛可能是检测和/或解决干扰的重要部位。对单个任务的分析揭示了各任务之间不同的激活模式。我们认为，区分干扰可能得到解决的处理阶段或许可以解释区域激活差异。我们的分析表明，作用于刺激编码、反应选择和反应执行的解决过程可能会征募不同的神经区域。
