• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引产失败的预测因素。

Factors predicting failure of labour induction.

作者信息

Oboro V O, Isawumi A I, Akinola S E, Komolafe J O, Tijani A M, Adesina A O

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria.

出版信息

Niger Postgrad Med J. 2007 Jun;14(2):137-9.

PMID:17599113
Abstract

Our objective was to identify risk factors for failed labour induction. From January 2001 to December 2005, we conducted a retrospective case-control study in a Nigerian University Hospital. Cases were women who failed to deliver vaginally after labour induction, and therefore had caesarean section. Controls were patients who were similarly induced and achieved vaginal delivery. Univariate followed by Logistic regression analysis were performed. Failed induction occurred in 37.6%. Variables significantly and independently associated with failed induction were cervical effacement < 70% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.65-9.90), Bishop's score < 6 (OR 3.47; CI 1.75 - 6.85), nulliparity (OR 3.91; CI 1.92 - 7.99). Prolonged pregnancy independently reduced failure rate (OR 0.44: CI 0.24 - 0.81). These variables can help determine patients that will require early recourse to caesarean delivery in order to avoid prolonged induction-delivery interval.

摘要

我们的目标是确定引产失败的风险因素。2001年1月至2005年12月,我们在一家尼日利亚大学医院进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。病例为引产术后未能经阴道分娩、因此接受剖宫产的女性。对照为同样接受引产并成功经阴道分娩的患者。进行了单因素分析,随后进行逻辑回归分析。引产失败率为37.6%。与引产失败显著且独立相关的变量包括宫颈消退<70%(调整比值比[OR]5.12;95%置信区间[CI]2.65 - 9.90)、Bishop评分<6(OR 3.47;CI 1.75 - 6.85)、初产(OR 3.91;CI 1.92 - 7.99)。过期妊娠独立降低了失败率(OR 0.44:CI 0.24 - 0.81)。这些变量有助于确定哪些患者需要尽早采取剖宫产,以避免引产至分娩间隔延长。

相似文献

1
Factors predicting failure of labour induction.引产失败的预测因素。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2007 Jun;14(2):137-9.
2
Vaginal misoprostol induction of labour: a Nigerian hospital experience.米索前列醇阴道引产:尼日利亚一家医院的经验
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Apr;24(3):239-42. doi: 10.1080/01443610410001660698.
3
Misoprostol use for cervical ripening and induction of labour in a Nigerian teaching hospital.米索前列醇在尼日利亚一家教学医院用于宫颈成熟和引产。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2007 Sep;10(3):234-7.
4
Induction of labor with prostaglandins for medical reasons: determining explanatory variables of the induction to delivery time interval for vaginal deliveries and caesarean section.因医学原因使用前列腺素引产:确定阴道分娩和剖宫产引产至分娩时间间隔的解释变量。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Dec;135(2):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.004. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
5
Preeclampsia: is induction of labor more successful?子痫前期:引产是否更成功?
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):600-3. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00043-4.
6
Factors predictive of failed operative vaginal delivery.手术阴道分娩失败的预测因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.073.
7
Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.宫颈条件不佳的早产、足月产及过期产患者引产时剖宫产的危险因素。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;67(2):113-7. doi: 10.1159/000166307. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
8
Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors.引产中的急诊剖宫产:危险因素评估
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 May;84(5):456-62. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00620.x.
9
Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester.阴道米索前列醇用于晚期妊娠宫颈条件不佳时引产的有效性和安全性。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):33-5.
10
Reduction in caesarean delivery with fetal heart rate monitoring and intermittent pulse oximetry after induction of labour with misoprostol.米索前列醇引产术后使用胎儿心率监测和间歇性脉搏血氧饱和度测定法降低剖宫产率
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 May;22(5):445-51. doi: 10.1080/14767050802613207.