Hammond John I, Luttbeg Barney, Sih Andrew
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1525-35. doi: 10.1890/06-1236.
Predator and prey spatial distributions have important population and community level consequences. However, little is known either theoretically or empirically about behavioral mechanisms that underlie the spatial patterns that emerge when predators and prey freely interact. We examined the joint space use and behavioral rules governing movement of freely interacting groups of odonate (dragonfly) predators and two size classes of anuran (tadpole) prey in arenas containing two patches with different levels of the prey's resource. Predator and prey movement and space use was quantified both when they were apart and together. When apart from predators, large tadpoles strongly preferred the high resource patch. When apart from prey, dragonflies weakly preferred the high resource patch. When together, large prey shifted to a uniform distribution, while predators strongly preferred the high resource patch. These patterns qualitatively fit the predictions of several three trophic level, ideal free distribution models. In contrast, the space use of small prey and predators did not deviate from uniform. Three measures of joint space use (spatial correlations, overlap, and co-occurrence) concurred in suggesting that prey avoidance of predators was more important than predator attraction to prey in determining overall spatial patterns. To gain additional insight into behavioral mechanisms, we used a model selection approach to identify behavioral movement rules that can potentially explain the observed, emergent patterns of space use. Prey were more likely to leave patches with more predators and more conspecific competitors; resources had relatively weak effects on prey movements. In contrast, predators were more likely to leave patches with low resources (that they do not consume) and more competing predators; prey had relatively little effect on predator movements. These results highlight the importance of investigating freely interacting predators and prey, the potential for simple game theory models to predict joint spatial distributions, and the utility of using model choice methods to identify potential key factors that govern movement.
捕食者与猎物的空间分布具有重要的种群和群落层面的影响。然而,对于捕食者与猎物自由相互作用时所出现的空间格局背后的行为机制,无论是在理论上还是实证方面,我们了解得都很少。我们在含有两个具有不同猎物资源水平斑块的实验场地中,研究了自由相互作用的蜻蜓目(蜻蜓)捕食者群体与两类不同大小的无尾目(蝌蚪)猎物群体的空间利用情况以及支配其移动的行为规则。分别对捕食者与猎物分开时以及在一起时的移动和空间利用进行了量化。当与捕食者分开时,大型蝌蚪强烈偏好高资源斑块。当与猎物分开时,蜻蜓对高资源斑块的偏好较弱。当它们在一起时,大型猎物转变为均匀分布,而捕食者则强烈偏好高资源斑块。这些模式在定性上符合几种三营养级理想自由分布模型的预测。相比之下,小型猎物和捕食者的空间利用并没有偏离均匀分布。三种联合空间利用的测量方法(空间相关性、重叠度和共现性)都表明,在决定总体空间格局方面,猎物对捕食者的回避比捕食者对猎物的吸引更为重要。为了进一步深入了解行为机制,我们采用模型选择方法来确定可能解释观察到的空间利用模式的行为移动规则。猎物更有可能离开有更多捕食者和更多同种竞争者的斑块;资源对猎物移动的影响相对较弱。相比之下,捕食者更有可能离开资源少(它们不消耗)且有更多竞争捕食者的斑块;猎物对捕食者移动的影响相对较小。这些结果凸显了研究自由相互作用的捕食者与猎物的重要性、简单博弈论模型预测联合空间分布的潜力,以及使用模型选择方法识别支配移动的潜在关键因素的效用。