Winkler Natalia S, Paz-Goicoechea Maite, Lamb Robert W, Pérez-Matus Alejandro
Subtidal Ecology Laboratory and Marine Conservation Center Estación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Brown University Providence RI USA.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov 15;7(24):11124-11134. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3604. eCollection 2017 Dec.
Predators select prey so as to maximize energy and minimize manipulation time. In order to reduce prey detection and handling time, individuals must actively select their foraging space (microhabitat) and populations exhibit morphologies that are best suited for capturing locally available prey. We explored how variation in diet correlates with habitat type, and how these factors influence key morphological structures (mouth gape, eye diameter, fin length, fin area, and pectoral fin ratio) in a common microcarnivorous cryptic reef fish species, the triplefin . In a mensurative experiment carried out at six kelp-dominated sites, we observed considerable differences in diet along 400 km of the Chilean coast coincident with variation in habitat availability and prey distributions. Triplefins preferred a single prey type (bivalves or barnacles) at northern sites, coincident with a low diversity of foraging habitats. In contrast, southern sites presented varied and heterogeneous habitats, where triplefin diets were more diverse and included amphipods, decapods, and cumaceans. Allometry-corrected results indicated that some morphological structures were consistently correlated with different prey items. Specifically, large mouth gape was associated with the capture of highly mobile prey such as decapods, while small mouth gape was more associated with cumaceans and copepods. In contrast, triplefins that capture sessile prey such as hydroids tend to have larger eyes. Therefore, morphological structures co-vary with habitat selection and prey usage in this species. Our study shows how an abundant generalist reef fish exhibits variable feeding morphologies in response to the distribution of potential habitats and prey throughout its range.
捕食者选择猎物是为了使能量最大化并使操控时间最小化。为了减少猎物的发现和处理时间,个体必须积极选择其觅食空间(微生境),并且种群呈现出最适合捕获当地可得猎物的形态。我们探究了饮食差异如何与栖息地类型相关,以及这些因素如何影响一种常见的小型肉食性隐蔽礁鱼——三鳍鱼的关键形态结构(口裂、眼径、鳍长、鳍面积和胸鳍比例)。在六个以海带为主的地点进行的一项测量实验中,我们观察到沿着智利海岸400公里的区域,饮食存在显著差异,这与栖息地可用性和猎物分布的变化相一致。在北部地区,三鳍鱼偏好单一猎物类型(双壳类或藤壶),这与觅食栖息地的低多样性相吻合。相比之下,南部地区呈现出多样且异质的栖息地,三鳍鱼的饮食更加多样化,并包括端足类、十足类和涟虫类。异速生长校正后的结果表明,一些形态结构与不同的猎物种类始终存在相关性。具体而言,大口裂与捕获高度移动的猎物(如十足类)有关,而小口裂则更多地与涟虫类和桡足类有关。相比之下,捕获固着猎物(如水螅虫)的三鳍鱼往往眼睛更大。因此,在这个物种中,形态结构与栖息地选择和猎物利用共同变化。我们的研究表明,一种丰富常见的礁鱼如何根据其分布范围内潜在栖息地和猎物的分布呈现出可变的摄食形态。