Demirbag Derya, Unlu Ercument, Ozdemir Ferda, Genchellac Hakan, Temizoz Osman, Ozdemir Huseyin, Demir M Kemal
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Trakya, Edirne, Turkey.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jul;88(7):844-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.015.
To investigate the differences in findings from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the neutral and provocative positions, and to examine the relationship between these differences and the results of physical examination tests in patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS).
Prospective.
University physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient and radiology clinics.
Twenty-nine patients and 12 healthy controls. All of the patients had positive bilateral TOS stress tests; control group participants were symptom free and had negative TOS stress tests bilaterally.
Not applicable.
All participants underwent Adson's test, the Halsted maneuver, and a hyperabduction test. All were evaluated with MRI while in 2 positions: the neutral position (upper extremities adducted) and in a provocative position. Measurements were obtained at the interscalene triangle, at the costoclavicular space, and at the retropectoralis minor space.
There was a significant difference in MRI findings between the neutral and provocative position in the patients (P<.05), but there were no significant differences in the control group. There was a significant difference in the positional change values in MRI between the patients and the control subjects (P<.05). The difference was found in the minimum costoclavicular distance between patients with a positive Halsted maneuver and a negative Halsted maneuver (P<.05).
Our findings indicate that MRI findings in patients in a provocative position are more valuable in the diagnosis of TOS, and these findings are in accord with findings from the physical evaluation tests.
研究胸廓出口综合征(TOS)患者在中立位和激发位时磁共振成像(MRI)结果的差异,并探讨这些差异与体格检查结果之间的关系。
前瞻性研究。
大学物理医学与康复门诊及放射科诊所。
29例患者和12名健康对照者。所有患者双侧TOS应力试验均为阳性;对照组参与者无症状,双侧TOS应力试验均为阴性。
不适用。
所有参与者均接受Adson试验、Halsted手法和过度外展试验。所有参与者在两个体位下接受MRI评估:中立位(上肢内收)和激发位。在斜角肌间隙、肋锁间隙和胸小肌后间隙进行测量。
患者中立位和激发位的MRI表现存在显著差异(P<0.05),但对照组无显著差异。患者与对照者MRI的位置变化值存在显著差异(P<0.05)。在Halsted手法阳性和阴性的患者之间,肋锁间隙最小距离存在差异(P<0.05)。
我们的研究结果表明,激发位患者的MRI表现对TOS的诊断更有价值,且这些表现与体格检查结果一致。