Suppr超能文献

胰腺癌的扩大切除术

Extended resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

作者信息

Reddy Srinevas K, Tyler Douglas S, Pappas Theodore N, Clary Bryan M

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Box 3247, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2007 Jun;12(6):654-63. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-6-654.

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas presents a number of therapeutic challenges. Given the poor long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), many surgeons have sought to improve survival via a radical or "extended" pancreatectomy which may include (a) total pancreatectomy (TP), (b) extended lymph node dissection (ELND), and (c) portal/mesenteric vascular resections. These themes of "extended" resection are addressed in this review. TP should not be performed for most cases of adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head because of the nominal incidence of lymph node involvement along the body and tail of the pancreas, the scarcity of multicentric disease, and the better management of pancreatic leaks after PD. Most studies show no difference in long-term survival and demonstrate greater postoperative morbidity after TP than after PD. Performing ELND in addition to PD is not worthwhile because most studies do not demonstrate any long-term benefits from ELND and the circumferential dissection around the mesenteric vessels required to harvest distant lymph nodes increases postoperative morbidity. Major arterial resection increases postoperative morbidity after PD and worsens long-term survival as the need for arterial resection to achieve negative resection margins indicates more aggressive disease. In contrast, portal and/or mesenteric venous resection does not increase the morbidity after PD or impact long-term survival as venous resection is often performed because of tumor location and not extent of disease. The disappointing experience with extended resections underscores the need for better adjuvant systemic strategies and the interdisciplinary care of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

摘要

胰腺癌的治疗面临诸多挑战。鉴于胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后的长期预后较差,许多外科医生试图通过根治性或“扩大”胰腺切除术来提高生存率,这可能包括:(a)全胰切除术(TP);(b)扩大淋巴结清扫术(ELND);以及(c)门静脉/肠系膜血管切除术。本综述将探讨这些“扩大”切除术的相关问题。对于大多数胰头腺癌病例,不应进行TP,原因在于胰腺体尾部淋巴结受累的发生率较低、多中心疾病罕见,以及PD后胰腺瘘的处理效果更好。大多数研究表明,TP与PD相比,长期生存率无差异,且TP术后的发病率更高。除PD外进行ELND并不值得,因为大多数研究未显示ELND有任何长期益处,且获取远处淋巴结所需的肠系膜血管周围的环形清扫会增加术后发病率。主要动脉切除术会增加PD后的术后发病率,并使长期生存率恶化,因为为达到阴性切缘而进行动脉切除术表明疾病更具侵袭性。相比之下,门静脉和/或肠系膜静脉切除术不会增加PD后的发病率,也不会影响长期生存率,因为进行静脉切除术通常是由于肿瘤位置而非疾病范围。扩大切除术令人失望的经验凸显了需要更好的辅助全身治疗策略以及对胰腺癌患者进行多学科护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验