Sakar Ayşin, Yorgancioğlu Arzu, Aydemir Omer, Sepit Levent, Celik Pinar
Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.
Tuberk Toraks. 2007;55(2):135-40.
This study is aimed to evaluate the health related quality of life (HRQL) in asthmatics and the probable association between HRQL and disease severity and also other demographic factors by using a generic scale, SF-36 questionnaire. One-hundred and two asthmatics were enrolled. The scores of the 8 domains of SF-36 questionnaire were evaluated according to age, gender, status of education and compared with the severity of asthma. The mean age of 84 (83%) female and 18 (17%) male patients was 42.86 +/- 11.15. Fifty-two of them was well educated (51%) and 50 was poorly educated (49%). Atopy ratio was 81%. Mild intermittent, mild persistent and moderate-severe persistent groups were 27 (26%), 46 (45%) and 29 (29%) respectively. Female gender were worse in physical functioning (p= 0.000), physical role difficulties (p= 0.0049), vitality (p= 0.045) and social functioning (p= 0.025). Poorly educated group were worse in physical functioning (p= 0.001), physical role difficulties (p= 0.039), vitality (p= 0.045), emotional role difficulties (p= 0.046), general health (p= 0.030) and mental health (p= 0.044). Mental health was worse in the presence of atopy (p= .035). Physical functioning was better in mild intermittent group than moderate and severe persistent group (p= 0.024). General health was better in mild intermittent group than mild persistent group (p= 0.018), moderate and severe persistent group (p= 0.015). Vitality and emotional role difficulties was better in mild intermittent than mild persistent group (p= 0.042, p= 0.007). The HRQL scores and severity of asthma is well correlated like other objective parameters. So one of the primary goals in management of asthma should also improve QOL as well as functional parameters.
本研究旨在通过使用通用量表SF - 36问卷评估哮喘患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQL),以及HRQL与疾病严重程度和其他人口统计学因素之间的可能关联。招募了102名哮喘患者。根据年龄、性别、教育程度对SF - 36问卷的8个领域得分进行评估,并与哮喘严重程度进行比较。84名(83%)女性和18名(17%)男性患者的平均年龄为42.86±11.15岁。其中52人受教育程度良好(51%),50人受教育程度较差(49%)。特应性比例为81%。轻度间歇性、轻度持续性和中度 - 重度持续性组分别为27人(26%)、46人(45%)和29人(29%)。女性在身体功能(p = 0.000)、身体角色困难(p = 0.0049)、活力(p = 0.045)和社会功能(p = 0.025)方面表现较差。受教育程度较差的组在身体功能(p = 0.001)、身体角色困难(p = 0.039)、活力(p = 0.045)、情感角色困难(p = 0.046)、总体健康(p = 0.030)和心理健康(p = 0.044)方面表现较差。存在特应性时心理健康较差(p = 0.035)。轻度间歇性组的身体功能比中度和重度持续性组更好(p = 0.024)。轻度间歇性组的总体健康比轻度持续性组更好(p = 0.018),比中度和重度持续性组更好(p = 0.015)。轻度间歇性组的活力和情感角色困难比轻度持续性组更好(p = 0.042,p = 0.007)。HRQL得分与哮喘严重程度的相关性与其他客观参数一样良好。因此,哮喘管理的主要目标之一除了改善功能参数外,还应提高生活质量。