Moore G W, Henley A, Greenwood C K, Rangarajan S
Centre for Haemostasis and Thrombosis, Haemophilia Reference Centre, 1st Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, England.
Thromb Res. 2008;121(4):477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
Accurate and timely detection of lupus anticoagulants (LA) is of diagnostic and prognostic importance due to the association of persistent LA with thrombotic disease. Antibody heterogeneity and assay variability complicate LA detection and weak antibodies can go undetected.
Screen and confirm assays on equal volume mixing studies were performed on known LA using dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT), dilute activated partial thromboplastin time (DAPTT) and activated seven lupus anticoagulant (ASLA) assay. Two established calculations for phospholipid dependence were applied to ascertain whether any antibodies diluted to within screening test reference ranges maintained a significant difference between screen and confirm results sufficient to imply LA activity. We then performed confirmatory tests on neat plasma samples from patients with thrombotic disease whose screening tests were within reference ranges.
Forty nine of 155 DRVVT positive LA were conventionally positive in the mixing studies and 8 of the 106 negative mixing studies showed significant screen and confirm test discordance. This was the case for 21 of 56 negative DAPTT mixing studies and 2 of 39 negative ASLA mixing studies. Performance of confirm assays on the neat plasma samples with screen results within reference ranges revealed possible LA activity in 19 of 166 DRVVT results, 63 of 184 DAPTT results and 9 of 117 ASLA results.
LA activity can be demonstrated by assessment of screen and confirm data irrespective of screening test elevation above a reference range. Other workers have demonstrated this phenomenon in APTT using different study designs and it may be that standard interpretation criteria warrant re-assessment.
由于持续性狼疮抗凝物(LA)与血栓性疾病相关,准确及时地检测LA具有诊断和预后重要性。抗体异质性和检测变异性使LA检测复杂化,弱抗体可能未被检测到。
使用稀释蝰蛇毒时间(DRVVT)、稀释活化部分凝血活酶时间(DAPTT)和活化七狼疮抗凝物(ASLA)检测法,对已知LA进行等体积混合研究的筛查和确证检测。应用两种既定的磷脂依赖性计算方法,以确定稀释至筛查试验参考范围内的任何抗体在筛查和确证结果之间是否仍存在足以暗示LA活性的显著差异。然后,我们对筛查试验在参考范围内的血栓性疾病患者的纯血浆样本进行确证试验。
155例DRVVT阳性LA中有49例在混合研究中常规呈阳性,106例阴性混合研究中有8例显示筛查和确证试验存在显著不一致。56例阴性DAPTT混合研究中有21例是这种情况,39例阴性ASLA混合研究中有2例是这种情况。对筛查结果在参考范围内的纯血浆样本进行确证试验,结果显示166例DRVVT结果中有19例、184例DAPTT结果中有63例、117例ASLA结果中有9例可能存在LA活性。
无论筛查试验是否高于参考范围,通过评估筛查和确证数据均可证明LA活性。其他研究人员使用不同的研究设计在活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)中证明了这一现象,可能需要重新评估标准解释标准。