Alwan Majd, Sifferlin Elena Brito, Turner Beverely, Kell Steve, Brower Peter, Mack David C, Dalal Siddharth, Felder Robin A
Medical Automation Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2007 Jun;13(3):279-85. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0056.
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of passive health status monitoring on the cost of care, as well as the efficiencies of professional caregivers in assisted living. We performed a case-controlled study to assess economic impact of passive health status monitoring technology in an assisted-living facility. Passive monitoring systems were installed in the assisted-living units of 21 residents to track physiological parameters (heart rate and breathing rate), the activities of daily living (ADLs), and key alert conditions. Professional caregivers were provided with access to the wellness status of the monitored residents they serve. The monitored individuals' cost of medical care was compared to that of an age, gender, and health status matched cohort. Similarly, efficiency and workloads of professional caregivers providing care to the monitored individuals were compared to those of caregivers providing care to the control cohort in the control site. Over the 3-month period of the study, a comparison between the monitored and control cohorts showed reductions in billable interventions (47 vs. 73, p = 0.040), hospital days (7 vs. 33, p = 0.004), and estimated cost of care (21,187.02 dollars vs. 67,753.88 dollars with monitoring cost included, p = 0.034). A comparison between efficiency normalized workloads of monitoring and control sites' caregivers revealed significant differences both at the beginning (0.6 vs. 1.38, p = 0.041) and the end (0.84 vs. 1.94, p = 0.002) of the study. The results demonstrate that monitoring technologies have significantly reduced billable interventions, hospital days, and cost of care to payers, and had a positive impact on professional caregivers' efficiency.
本研究的目的是评估被动健康状态监测对护理成本的影响,以及对辅助生活中专业护理人员工作效率的影响。我们进行了一项病例对照研究,以评估被动健康状态监测技术在一家辅助生活设施中的经济影响。在21名居民的辅助生活单元中安装了被动监测系统,以跟踪生理参数(心率和呼吸率)、日常生活活动(ADL)和关键警报状况。为专业护理人员提供了他们所服务的受监测居民的健康状况信息。将受监测个体的医疗护理成本与年龄、性别和健康状况相匹配的队列进行比较。同样,将为受监测个体提供护理的专业护理人员的效率和工作量与对照地点为对照队列提供护理的护理人员的效率和工作量进行比较。在研究的3个月期间,受监测队列与对照队列之间的比较显示,可计费干预措施减少(47比73,p = 0.040)、住院天数减少(7比33,p = 0.004)以及估计护理成本减少(包括监测成本在内,21,187.02美元比67,753.88美元,p = 0.034)。监测地点和对照地点护理人员的效率标准化工作量比较显示,在研究开始时(0.6比1.38,p = 0.041)和结束时(0.84比1.94,p = 0.002)均存在显著差异。结果表明,监测技术显著减少了可计费干预措施、住院天数和支付方的护理成本,并对专业护理人员的效率产生了积极影响。