Liston W A, Kilpatrick D C
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Nov;98(11):1079-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15358.x.
To determine whether any simple, purely genetic mechanism can account for susceptibility to pre-eclampsia.
Six simple Mendelian models of inheritance were considered, and predictions concerning the incidence of pre-eclampsia in various family members of index cases were calculated for each genetic model. Data were then extracted from published family studies in which a suitable disease definition had been used, and compared to our theoretical expectations.
Only one of the genetic models considered, in which both mother and fetus must express the same recessive gene to confer susceptibility, was consistent with the observed incidence values for relatives of index cases. This model was also consistent with the putative association with HLA-DR4, but could not account for the comparative rarity of pre-eclampsia in parous women.
Homozygosity for a single recessive gene shared by mother and fetus, unlike five other genetic mechanisms tested, is consistent with published family studies in pre-eclampsia, and should be considered the best working hypothesis at present.
确定是否存在任何简单的纯遗传机制可解释子痫前期易感性。
考虑了六种简单的孟德尔遗传模型,针对每个遗传模型计算了指数病例的不同家庭成员中子痫前期发病率的预测值。然后从已发表的家族研究中提取数据,这些研究使用了合适的疾病定义,并与我们的理论预期进行比较。
所考虑的遗传模型中只有一个模型与观察到的指数病例亲属的发病率值一致,在该模型中母亲和胎儿都必须表达相同的隐性基因才能导致易感性。该模型也与假定的与HLA - DR4的关联一致,但无法解释经产妇中子痫前期相对罕见的情况。
与其他五种测试的遗传机制不同,母亲和胎儿共有的单个隐性基因纯合性与已发表的子痫前期家族研究一致,应被视为目前最佳的可行假设。