Nienhaus A, Schablon A, Bâcle C Le, Siano B, Diel R
Department of Occupational Health Research, Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Pappelallee 35-37, 22089 Hamburg, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jan;81(3):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0212-1. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
An in vitro test for the diagnosis of latent TB-infection (LTBI) is now available that has the potential to replace the tuberculin skin test (TST). The new test measures the cell-mediated immune response to TB antigens. Little experience is currently available on the performance of the IGRA when testing HCW for LTBI. Therefore the aim of the study was to compare the IGRA with the TST in testing HCW for LTBI.
The medical staffs of three hospitals were simultaneously tested with TST (RT23) and IGRA (QFT). The study comprises 261 HCW, all exposed to active TB-patients. Information on gender, age, workplace, BCG vaccination and history of both TB and TST were collected using a standardised questionnaire.
The TST was positive in 24.1% and the IGRA in 9.6% of the participants. Agreement between the tests was low in HCW with a BCG-vaccination. A history of an earlier TST was a risk factor for a positive TST but not for a positive IGRA. Out of 48 results positive in the TST but negative in the IGRA 97.8% might be explained by BCG vaccination or an earlier TST. A positive association between age and LTBI was observed for the IGRA but not for the TST results. Out of 25 positive results in the IGRA only 60% were recognized by the TST, too. The HCW with a positive IGRA and a negative TST had the same age (mean 49.1) as the HCW positive in both tests (mean 50.9), which was higher than the age of those negative in both tests (mean 38.8).
The data indicate that the IGRA should replace the TST in serial testing of HCW in high income, low incidence countries. The recommendations to use the IGRA in order to verify a positive TST only should be reconsidered.
目前已有一种用于诊断潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)的体外检测方法,其有可能取代结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)。这种新检测方法可测量机体对结核抗原的细胞介导免疫反应。目前,关于在医护人员中检测LTBI时γ-干扰素释放试验(IGRA)的性能方面的经验还很少。因此,本研究的目的是比较IGRA和TST在检测医护人员LTBI方面的效果。
三家医院的医务人员同时接受TST(RT23)和IGRA(QFT)检测。该研究纳入了261名医护人员,他们均接触过活动性结核病患者。使用标准化问卷收集了有关性别、年龄、工作场所、卡介苗接种情况以及结核病和TST病史的信息。
24.1%的参与者TST呈阳性,9.6%的参与者IGRA呈阳性。在接种过卡介苗的医护人员中,两种检测方法之间的一致性较低。既往TST检测史是TST呈阳性的一个危险因素,但不是IGRA呈阳性的危险因素。在48例TST呈阳性但IGRA呈阴性的结果中,97.8%可能是由卡介苗接种或既往TST检测所致。对于IGRA,观察到年龄与LTBI之间存在正相关,但对于TST结果则未观察到这种相关性。在IGRA的25例阳性结果中,只有60%也被TST检测出阳性。IGRA呈阳性而TST呈阴性的医护人员的年龄(平均49.1岁)与两种检测均呈阳性的医护人员的年龄(平均50.9岁)相同,这高于两种检测均呈阴性的医护人员的年龄(平均38.8岁)。
数据表明,在高收入、低发病率国家的医护人员系列检测中,IGRA应取代TST。仅为验证TST阳性结果而使用IGRA的建议应重新考虑。