Suppr超能文献

口腔扁平苔藓颊黏膜活检:传统方法与新型压力钳的应用对比

Biopsy of the buccal mucosa in oral lichen planus: the traditional method versus the use of a new pressure forceps.

作者信息

Bermejo-Fenoll Ambrosio, López-Jornet María Pía, Jiménez-Torres María José, Camacho-Alonso Fabio, Orduña-Domingo Albina

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine, University of Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Jul;138(7):957-62. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0292.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors designed a pressure forceps, called the "B forceps," for use in performing biopsies. They compared biopsy specimens taken with and without the aid of the B forceps from buccal mucosa of 84 patients divided equally into two groups, all of whom satisfied the World Health Organization's diagnostic criteria for oral lichen planus. They analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of using this instrument.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 42 patients in group A underwent a conventional biopsy (29 with a scalpel and 13 with a punch). The 42 patients in group B underwent a biopsy performed with the B forceps and a punch. The authors studied artifacts of fragmentation, pseudocysts, crushing, fissures and hemorrhages histologically in both groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences within group A between the subjects who had undergone either the scalpel or the punch biopsy. There were, however, significant differences between groups A and B. Group B experienced less fragmentation (P = .021), fewer fissures (P = .001) and fewer hemorrhages (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The new B forceps was a useful aid in the performance of biopsies. It improved visibility and reduced the time needed for the procedure. Biopsy specimens taken with the B forceps also had histologically fewer artifacts than did those taken without the B forceps.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This technique using the B forceps has several advantages, including speed, because the ischemia produced by the clamp stabilizes the tissue and increases visibility, facilitating dissection. The time needed for surgical removal thus is shortened.

摘要

背景

作者设计了一种用于活检的压力钳,称为“B钳”。他们比较了84例患者颊黏膜活检标本,这些患者被平均分为两组,均符合世界卫生组织口腔扁平苔藓的诊断标准,一组在使用B钳辅助下获取活检标本,另一组未使用。他们分析了使用该器械的优缺点。

材料与方法

A组42例患者接受传统活检(29例使用手术刀,13例使用打孔器)。B组42例患者使用B钳和打孔器进行活检。作者对两组标本的碎裂、假囊肿、挤压、裂隙和出血等组织学假象进行了研究。

结果

A组中接受手术刀或打孔器活检的患者之间无显著差异。然而,A组和B组之间存在显著差异。B组的碎裂情况较少(P = 0.021),裂隙较少(P = 0.001),出血较少(P = 0.001)。

结论

新型B钳对活检操作有帮助。它提高了视野清晰度,减少了操作所需时间。使用B钳获取的活检标本在组织学上的假象也比未使用B钳获取的标本少。

临床意义

使用B钳的这项技术有几个优点,包括速度快,因为钳夹产生的缺血使组织稳定并增加视野清晰度,便于解剖。因此缩短了手术切除所需时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验