• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用聚合酶链反应指纹图谱鉴别禽气管鸟杆菌分离株。

Application of polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting to differentiate Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates.

作者信息

Thachil Anil J, Velayudhan Binu T, Lopes-Berkas Vanessa C, Halvorson David A, Nagaraja Kakambi V

机构信息

Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007 Jul;19(4):417-20. doi: 10.1177/104063870701900415.

DOI:10.1177/104063870701900415
PMID:17609355
Abstract

Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) is an infectious respiratory pathogen of chickens, turkeys, and wild birds. There are 18 serotypes of ORT reported worldwide. In this study, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) polymerase chain reaction and random amplified polymorphic DNA assay with Universal M13 primer-based fingerprinting techniques were investigated for their ability to differentiate ORT isolates. The authors examined 50 field isolates and 8 reference strains of ORT for their genetic differences. The fingerprint patterns were compared with serotyping results of ORT by the agar gel precipitation test. M13 fingerprinting revealed different patterns for 6 reference serotypes of ORT that were tested, namely, C, D, E, I, J, and K. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale reference serotypes A and F yielded indistinguishable fingerprints with M13 fingerprinting. The ERIC 1R technique discerned only 5 of the 8 reference serotypes of ORT. Distinct fingerprints were also found within the ORT serotypes with both techniques. From 58 isolates of ORT that were fingerprinted belonging to 8 ORT serotypes, 10 different fingerprints were obtained with M13 fingerprinting and 6 different fingerprints were obtained with ERIC 1R fingerprinting. M13 fingerprinting technique was found to be more discriminative in differentiating ORT isolates than the ERIC 1R fingerprinting technique. These results suggest that fingerprinting techniques may be a more discerning tool for characterizing ORT isolates than the serological test using the agar gel precipitation test. This fingerprinting technique could potentially be a valuable tool in identifying an isolate from a clinical outbreak of ORT infection for development of an autogenous vaccine.

摘要

禽气管鸟杆菌(ORT)是鸡、火鸡和野生鸟类的一种传染性呼吸道病原体。全球已报道有18种ORT血清型。在本研究中,对肠杆菌重复基因间共有序列(ERIC)聚合酶链反应以及基于通用M13引物指纹技术的随机扩增多态性DNA分析区分ORT分离株的能力进行了研究。作者检测了50株ORT野外分离株和8株参考菌株的遗传差异。通过琼脂凝胶沉淀试验将指纹图谱与ORT的血清分型结果进行比较。M13指纹分析显示,所检测的ORT的6种参考血清型(即C、D、E、I、J和K)呈现出不同的图谱。ORT参考血清型A和F通过M13指纹分析产生无法区分的指纹图谱。ERIC 1R技术仅能区分8种ORT参考血清型中的5种。两种技术在ORT血清型内也发现了不同的指纹图谱。在所进行指纹分析的属于8种ORT血清型的58株ORT分离株中,M13指纹分析获得了10种不同的指纹图谱,ERIC 1R指纹分析获得了6种不同的指纹图谱。结果发现M13指纹分析技术在区分ORT分离株方面比ERIC 1R指纹分析技术更具鉴别力。这些结果表明,与使用琼脂凝胶沉淀试验的血清学检测相比,指纹分析技术可能是一种更具鉴别力的ORT分离株鉴定工具。这种指纹分析技术有可能成为从ORT感染临床暴发中鉴定分离株以开发自家疫苗的一种有价值的工具。

相似文献

1
Application of polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting to differentiate Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates.应用聚合酶链反应指纹图谱鉴别禽气管鸟杆菌分离株。
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007 Jul;19(4):417-20. doi: 10.1177/104063870701900415.
2
Detection and typing of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale from German poultry flocks.德国家禽群中鼻气管鸟杆菌的检测与分型
Avian Dis. 2012 Dec;56(4):654-8. doi: 10.1637/10079-021412-Reg.1.
3
Characterization of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale field isolates from Hungary.匈牙利禽源鼻气管鸟杆菌野外分离株的特性分析
Avian Pathol. 2017 Oct;46(5):506-514. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2017.1321104. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Isolation, identification, antibiotic resistance profile and molecular analysis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheal isolates from turkeys.从火鸡中分离、鉴定、抗生素耐药谱分析及禽鸟分枝杆菌的分子分析。
Vet Med Sci. 2024 Jul;10(4):e1490. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1490.
5
An evaluation of ERIC PCR and AP PCR fingerprinting for discriminating Salmonella serotypes.用于区分沙门氏菌血清型的ERIC-PCR和AP-PCR指纹图谱评估。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998 Jul;27(1):24-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1998.00378.x.
6
Molecular Characterization of the Recently Emerged Poultry Pathogen Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale by Multilocus Sequence Typing.通过多位点序列分型对新出现的家禽病原体鼻气管鸟杆菌进行分子特征分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 1;11(2):e0148158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148158. eCollection 2016.
7
Use of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and single-enzyme amplified fragment length polymorphism in molecular typing of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale strains.
Avian Dis. 2009 Mar;53(1):108-14. doi: 10.1637/8474-092708-Reg.1.
8
Genetic Diversity of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale Isolated from Chickens and Turkeys in the United States.美国鸡和火鸡源鹦鹉热衣原体的遗传多样性。
Avian Dis. 2020 Sep 1;64(3):324-329. doi: 10.1637/aviandiseases-D-20-00007.
9
Isolation and identification of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in broiler breeder flocks of Guilan province, north of Iran.伊朗北部吉兰省肉种鸡群中气管鸟杆菌的分离与鉴定
Pak J Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 1;11(11):1487-91. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1487.1491.
10
Development of real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in poultry.用于检测家禽中鼻气管鸟杆菌的实时聚合酶链反应检测方法的开发。
Avian Dis. 2013 Sep;57(3):663-6. doi: 10.1637/10517-022213-ResNoteR.

引用本文的文献

1
Isolation, identification, antibiotic resistance profile and molecular analysis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheal isolates from turkeys.从火鸡中分离、鉴定、抗生素耐药谱分析及禽鸟分枝杆菌的分子分析。
Vet Med Sci. 2024 Jul;10(4):e1490. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1490.
2
Comparison and utilization of repetitive-element PCR techniques for typing Lactobacillus isolates from the chicken gastrointestinal tract.比较和利用重复元件 PCR 技术对鸡胃肠道分离的乳酸菌进行分型。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Nov;75(21):6764-76. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01150-09. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
3
Sero-prevalence and identification of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in broiler flocks in south-eastern Iran.
伊朗东南部肉鸡群中鼻气管鸟杆菌的血清流行率及鉴定
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009 Dec;41(8):1679-83. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9365-0. Epub 2009 May 14.