Burr M D, Josephson K L, Pepper I L
Department of Soils, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998 Jul;27(1):24-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1998.00378.x.
PCR fingerprints of 89 Salmonella isolates belonging to 22 serotypes were obtained using ERIC PCR (enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR) and AP PCR (arbitrarily primed PCR) to evaluate the ability of different fingerprinting methods to differentiate or identify serotypes and subtypes. Fingerprints were scored and comparisons were made using a computer program. ERIC PCR produced a unique, complex fingerprint for almost every isolate, but these fingerprints did not identify serotypes. One AP PCR primer also produced complex fingerprints that discriminated among isolates, but again did not identify serotypes. A second AP PCR primer produced simple patterns, including one pattern shared by 35 isolates from 12 different serotypes. In general, the three sets of PCR fingerprints distinguished isolates, but were not correlated with serotypes. Matching fingerprints from different gels by computer was difficult, since similarities were based on both intense and faint bands. In addition, this study suggests that dendrograms created from PCR fingerprints should be viewed with caution.
利用肠杆菌基因间重复一致序列聚合酶链反应(ERIC PCR)和任意引物聚合酶链反应(AP PCR)获得了属于22种血清型的89株沙门氏菌分离株的PCR指纹图谱,以评估不同指纹图谱方法区分或鉴定血清型及亚型的能力。对指纹图谱进行评分,并使用计算机程序进行比较。ERIC PCR几乎为每一株分离株产生了独特、复杂的指纹图谱,但这些指纹图谱无法鉴定血清型。一种AP PCR引物也产生了能区分不同分离株的复杂指纹图谱,但同样无法鉴定血清型。另一种AP PCR引物产生了简单的图谱,包括一种由来自12种不同血清型的35株分离株共有的图谱。总体而言,这三组PCR指纹图谱能区分分离株,但与血清型无关。通过计算机匹配不同凝胶上的指纹图谱很困难,因为相似性基于深带和浅带。此外,本研究表明,由PCR指纹图谱创建的树状图应谨慎看待。