Al-Mutairi S S, Sharma P N, Al-Alawi A, Al-Deen J S
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait.
Clin Exp Med. 2007 Jun;7(2):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s10238-007-0126-y. Epub 2007 Jul 4.
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) was introduced as an alternative modality to the conventional pulmonary function test (cPFT) to test lung mechanics. The objective of this study is to assess the use of IOS as an alternative, or in conjunction with cPFT, to categorise an obstructive respiratory disorder as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. Patients referred to the PFT laboratory, with different diagnoses of obstructive airways disorders, completed a standardised respiratory questionnaire prior to testing. All recruited subjects completed both modalities of PFT. A total of 146 patients were included. The overall mean age was 51+/-18.4 SD. The majority were non-smokers (68.7%). A standardised diagnosis of asthma was found for 51 subjects, while COPD was diagnosed in 36 subjects and 59 subjects were categorised as normal. The sensitivity of IOS in relation to asthma was 31.3% and 19.6% for cPFT. Among cases of COPD, the cPFT had better sensitivity (47.4%) than IOS (38.95%). The specificity was comparable for IOS and cPFT in relation to asthma and COPD. IOS had better sensitivity (45.8%) in detecting normal subjects than cPFT (28.8%), while specificity was comparable (80.5% and 86.2%, respectively). IOS may replace cPFT where the latter cannot be carried out due to feasibility or lack of cooperation. It can, however, discriminate between diseased and non-diseased subjects.
脉冲振荡法(IOS)作为传统肺功能测试(cPFT)的替代方法被引入,用于测试肺力学。本研究的目的是评估IOS作为cPFT的替代方法或与之联合使用,以将阻塞性呼吸系统疾病分类为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘。转诊至肺功能测试实验室、患有不同阻塞性气道疾病诊断的患者在测试前完成了一份标准化的呼吸问卷。所有招募的受试者均完成了两种肺功能测试方式。共纳入146例患者。总体平均年龄为51±18.4标准差。大多数为非吸烟者(68.7%)。51名受试者被诊断为标准化哮喘,36名受试者被诊断为COPD,59名受试者被分类为正常。IOS对哮喘的敏感性为31.3%,cPFT为19.6%。在COPD病例中,cPFT的敏感性(47.4%)高于IOS(38.95%)。IOS和cPFT在哮喘和COPD方面的特异性相当。IOS在检测正常受试者方面的敏感性(45.8%)高于cPFT(28.8%),而特异性相当(分别为80.5%和86.2%)。在因可行性或缺乏合作而无法进行cPFT的情况下,IOS可以替代cPFT。然而,它可以区分患病和未患病的受试者。