Becker David J
Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, RPHB 330, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1589-612. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00663.x.
To examine the effect of a weekend hospitalization on the timing and incidence of intensive cardiac procedures, and on subsequent expenditures, mortality and readmission rates for Medicare patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
The primary data are longitudinal, administrative claims for 922,074 elderly, non-rural, fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with AMI from 1989 to 1998. Annual patient-level cohorts provide information on ex ante health status, procedure use, expenditures, and health outcomes.
The patient is the primary unit of analysis. I use ordinary least squares regression to estimate the effect of weekend hospitalization on rates of cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, and bypass surgery (in various time periods subsequent to the initial hospitalization), 1-year expenditures and rates of adverse health outcomes in various periods following the AMI admission.
Weekend AMI patients are significantly less likely to receive immediate intensive cardiac procedures, and experience significantly higher rates of adverse health outcomes. Weekend admission leads to a 3.47 percentage point reduction in catheterization at 1 day, a 1.52 point reduction in angioplasty, and a 0.35 point reduction in by-pass surgery (p<.001 in all cases). The primary effect is delayed treatment, as weekend-weekday procedure differentials narrow over time from the initial hospitalization. Weekend patients experience a 0.38 percentage point (p<.001) increase in 1-year mortality and a 0.20 point (p<.001) increase in 1-year readmission with congestive heart failure.
Weekend hospitalization leads to delayed provision of intensive procedures and elevated 1-year mortality for elderly AMI patients. The existence of measurable differences in treatments raises questions regarding the efficacy of a single input regulation (e.g., mandated nurse staffing ratios) in enhancing the quality of weekend care. My results suggest that targeted financial incentives might be a more cost-effective policy response than broad regulation aimed at improving quality.
研究周末住院对急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院的医疗保险患者进行强化心脏手术的时间和发生率,以及后续支出、死亡率和再入院率的影响。
主要数据为1989年至1998年922,074名老年、非农村、按服务收费的医疗保险受益人因AMI住院的纵向行政索赔数据。年度患者层面队列提供了事前健康状况、手术使用情况、支出和健康结果方面的信息。
患者是主要分析单位。我使用普通最小二乘法回归来估计周末住院对心脏导管插入术、血管成形术和搭桥手术发生率(在初次住院后的不同时间段)、1年支出以及AMI入院后不同时间段不良健康结果发生率的影响。
周末AMI患者接受即时强化心脏手术的可能性显著降低,不良健康结果发生率显著更高。周末入院导致1天时导管插入术发生率降低3.47个百分点,血管成形术降低1.52个百分点,搭桥手术降低0.35个百分点(所有情况p<0.001)。主要影响是治疗延迟,因为从初次住院开始,周末与工作日手术差异随时间缩小。周末患者1年死亡率增加0.38个百分点(p<0.001),因充血性心力衰竭1年再入院率增加0.20个百分点(p<0.001)。
周末住院导致老年AMI患者强化手术的提供延迟和1年死亡率升高。治疗中存在可测量的差异,这引发了关于单一投入监管(如规定护士人员配备比例)在提高周末护理质量方面功效的问题。我的结果表明,有针对性的财政激励措施可能比旨在提高质量的广泛监管更具成本效益的政策应对措施。