Bjørnerem Ashild, Emaus Nina, Berntsen Gro K R, Joakimsen Ragnar M, Fønnebø Vinjar, Wilsgaard Tom, Oian Pål, Seeman Ego, Straume Bjørn
Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2007 Aug;81(2):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s00223-007-9035-z. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
Bone loss during advancing age in women and men is partly the result of sex steroid deficiency. As the contribution of circulating sex steroids and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) to bone loss remains uncertain, we sought to determine whether levels of sex steroids or SHBG predict change in bone mineral density (BMD) in women and men. A population-based study in the city of Tromsø of 6.5 years' duration (range 5.4-7.4) included 927 postmenopausal women aged 37-80 years and 894 men aged 25-80 years. Total estradiol and testosterone, calculated free levels, and SHBG were measured at baseline, and BMD change at the distal forearm was determined using BMD measurements in 1994-1995 and 2001. Bone loss was detected in postmenopausal women and men. Free estradiol and SHBG predicted age-adjusted bone loss in postmenopausal women, but only free estradiol was associated after further adjustment for body mass index and smoking in mixed models (P < 0.05). After same adjustment, only SHBG persisted as a significant independent predictor of bone loss in men (P < 0.001). However, only 1% of the variance in bone loss was accounted for by these measurements. We therefore conclude that the relations between sex steroids and bone loss are weak and measurements of sex steroids are unlikely to assist in clinical decision making.
随着年龄增长,女性和男性的骨质流失部分是由于性类固醇缺乏所致。由于循环性类固醇和性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)对骨质流失的作用仍不明确,我们试图确定性类固醇或SHBG的水平是否能预测女性和男性的骨矿物质密度(BMD)变化。在特罗姆瑟市进行的一项为期6.5年(范围为5.4 - 7.4年)的基于人群的研究,纳入了927名年龄在37 - 80岁的绝经后女性和894名年龄在25 - 80岁的男性。在基线时测量总雌二醇、睾酮、计算得出的游离水平以及SHBG,并通过1994 - 1995年和2001年的BMD测量来确定前臂远端的BMD变化。在绝经后女性和男性中均检测到骨质流失。游离雌二醇和SHBG可预测绝经后女性经年龄调整后的骨质流失,但在混合模型中进一步调整体重指数和吸烟因素后,只有游离雌二醇与之相关(P < 0.05)。经过相同调整后,只有SHBG持续作为男性骨质流失的显著独立预测因子(P < 0.001)。然而,这些测量仅解释了骨质流失中1%的方差。因此,我们得出结论,性类固醇与骨质流失之间的关系较弱,性类固醇测量不太可能有助于临床决策。