Journot Valérie, Tabuteau Sophie, Collin Fidéline, Molina Jean-Michel, Chene Geneviève, Rancinan Corinne
INSERM, U593, F-33076 Bordeaux, France.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Mar;29(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.05.007. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
Since 2003, the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) is the regulatory standard for safety report in clinical trials in the European Community. Yet, we found no published example of a practical experience for a scientifically oriented statistical analysis of events coded with MedDRA. We took advantage of a randomized trial in HIV-infected patients with MedDRA-coded events to explain the difficulties encountered during the events analysis and the strategy developed to report events consistently with trial-specific objectives.
MedDRA has a rich hierarchical structure, which allows the grouping of coded terms into 5 levels, the highest being "System Organ Class" (SOC). Each coded term may be related to several SOCs, among which one primary SOC is defined. We developed a new general 5-step strategy to select a SOC as trial primary SOC, consistently with trial-specific objectives for this analysis. We applied it to the ANRS 099 ALIZE trial, where all events were coded with MedDRA version 3.0. We compared the MedDRA and the ALIZE primary SOCs.
In the ANRS 099 ALIZE trial, 355 patients were recruited, and 3,722 events were reported and documented, among which 35% had multiple SOCs (2 to 4). We applied the proposed 5-step strategy. Altogether, 23% of MedDRA primary SOCs were modified, mainly from MedDRA primary SOCs "Investigations" (69%) and "Ear and labyrinth disorders" (6%), for the ALIZE primary SOCs "Hepatobiliary disorders" (35%), "Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders" (21%), and "Gastrointestinal disorders" (15%).
MedDRA largely enhanced in size and complexity with versioning and the development of Standardized MedDRA Queries. Yet, statisticians should not systematically rely on primary SOCs proposed by MedDRA to report events. A simple general 5-step strategy to re-classify events consistently with the trial-specific objectives might be useful in HIV trials as well as in other fields.
自2003年以来,《药物不良反应医学词典》(MedDRA)一直是欧盟临床试验安全性报告的监管标准。然而,我们未发现已发表的关于对使用MedDRA编码的事件进行科学导向的统计分析的实际经验示例。我们利用一项针对感染HIV患者的随机试验,其中事件采用MedDRA编码,来解释事件分析过程中遇到的困难以及为使事件报告与试验特定目标保持一致而制定的策略。
MedDRA具有丰富的层次结构,可将编码术语分组为5个级别,最高级别为“系统器官分类”(SOC)。每个编码术语可能与多个SOC相关,其中定义了一个主要SOC。我们制定了一种新的通用5步策略,以便根据此次分析的试验特定目标选择一个SOC作为试验主要SOC。我们将其应用于ANRS 099 ALIZE试验,该试验中所有事件均使用MedDRA 3.0版本进行编码。我们比较了MedDRA和ALIZE主要SOC。
在ANRS 099 ALIZE试验中,招募了355名患者,报告并记录了3722起事件,其中35%有多个SOC(2至4个)。我们应用了所提出的5步策略。总体而言,23%的MedDRA主要SOC被修改,主要从MedDRA主要SOC“检查(Investigations)”(69%)和“耳及迷路疾病”(6%),改为ALIZE主要SOC“肝胆疾病”(35%)、“肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病”(21%)以及“胃肠道疾病”(15%)。
随着版本更新以及标准化MedDRA查询的发展,MedDRA在规模和复杂性上有了很大提升。然而,统计人员不应一味依赖MedDRA提出的主要SOC来报告事件。一种简单的通用5步策略,用于根据试验特定目标对事件进行重新分类,在HIV试验以及其他领域可能会很有用。