Holtslag Herman R, Post Marcel W, van der Werken Chris, Lindeman Eline
University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, PO Box 85500, HP F00.810, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Apr;21(4):373-83. doi: 10.1177/0269215507072084.
To quantify the prevalence of return to work after major trauma, and to investigate the determinants of postinjury work status.
Prospective cohort study.
University Medical Centre Utrecht, a level 1 trauma centre in the Netherlands.
All severely injured (ISS > 16) adult (age = 16+) trauma survivors admitted from January 1999 to December 2000 who were full-time employed at the time of the injury were selected for follow-up (n = 214). Response rate was 93%. Outcome was assessed at a mean of 15 months (SD = 1.5) after injury. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified determinants at hospital discharge and at follow-up.
Following injury 58.4% of the patients (n = 125) were able to return to full-time employment, 21.5% had a part-time job, and 20.1% did not return to work. Univariate analysis yielded the following significant determinants of postinjury work status: age, comorbidity, injury severity score, brain injury, spinal cord injury, length of stay in an intensive care unit, hospital stay, discharge destination, percentage of permanent impairment (according to the fourth American Medical Association guide (AMA)), limitations in activities of daily living and cognitive complaints. Logistic regression analyses (23% explained variance) identified spinal cord injury, duration of hospital stay, discharge destination and age as determinants of return to work at hospital discharge. At follow-up, determinants of return to work included AMA, activities of daily living, cognitive complaints and being discharged home (51% explained variance).
Around 60% of the patients returned to their pre-injury work status after major trauma. The return to work rate was only partly explained by disability at follow-up. Independent determinants of return to work differ with the time of assessment.
量化严重创伤后重返工作岗位的比例,并调查伤后工作状态的决定因素。
前瞻性队列研究。
荷兰乌得勒支大学医学中心,一级创伤中心。
选取1999年1月至2000年12月期间收治的所有重伤(损伤严重度评分>16)成年(年龄≥16岁)创伤幸存者,这些患者在受伤时为全职工作,进行随访(n = 214)。应答率为93%。在受伤后平均15个月(标准差=1.5)时评估结果。多因素逻辑回归分析确定出院时和随访时的决定因素。
受伤后,58.4%的患者(n = 125)能够重返全职工作,21.5%从事兼职工作,20.1%未重返工作岗位。单因素分析得出以下伤后工作状态的显著决定因素:年龄、合并症、损伤严重度评分、脑损伤、脊髓损伤、重症监护病房住院时间、住院时间、出院去向、永久性损伤百分比(根据美国医学协会第四版指南)、日常生活活动受限和认知障碍。逻辑回归分析(解释方差23%)确定脊髓损伤、住院时间、出院去向和年龄是出院时重返工作岗位的决定因素。在随访时,重返工作岗位的决定因素包括美国医学协会指南、日常生活活动、认知障碍和出院回家(解释方差51%)。
约6%的患者在严重创伤后恢复到伤前的工作状态。随访时的残疾情况仅部分解释了重返工作岗位的比例。重返工作岗位的独立决定因素因评估时间而异。