Suppr超能文献

方法比较数据的回归模型。

Regression models for method comparison data.

作者信息

Dunn Graham

机构信息

Biostatistics Group, Division of Epidemiology & Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(4):739-56. doi: 10.1080/10543400701329513.

Abstract

Regression methods for the analysis of paired measurements produced by two fallible assay methods are described and their advantages and pitfalls discussed. The difficulties for the analysis, as in any errors-in-variables problem lies in the lack of identifiability of the model and the need to introduce questionable and often naïve assumptions in order to gain identifiability. Although not a panacea, the use of instrumental variables and associated instrumental variable (IV) regression methods in this area of application has great potential to improve the situation. Large samples are frequently needed and two-phase sampling methods are introduced to improve the efficiency of the IV estimators.

摘要

描述了用于分析由两种易出错的检测方法产生的配对测量值的回归方法,并讨论了它们的优点和缺陷。与任何变量误差问题一样,分析的困难在于模型缺乏可识别性,并且需要引入有问题且通常很天真的假设以获得可识别性。尽管不是万灵药,但在该应用领域中使用工具变量和相关的工具变量(IV)回归方法有很大潜力改善这种情况。通常需要大样本,并引入两阶段抽样方法以提高IV估计量的效率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验