Varady Krista A, Hellerstein Marc K
Department of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3104, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jul;86(1):7-13. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.1.7.
Calorie restriction (CR) and alternate-day fasting (ADF) represent 2 different forms of dietary restriction. Although the effects of CR on chronic disease prevention were reviewed previously, the effects of ADF on chronic disease risk have yet to be summarized. Accordingly, we review here animal and human evidence concerning ADF and the risk of certain chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. We also compare the magnitude of risk reduction resulting from ADF with that resulting from CR. In terms of diabetes risk, animal studies of ADF find lower diabetes incidence and lower fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, effects that are comparable to those of CR. Human trials to date have reported greater insulin-mediated glucose uptake but no effect on fasting glucose or insulin concentrations. In terms of cardiovascular disease risk, animal ADF data show lower total cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations, a lower heart rate, improved cardiac response to myocardial infarction, and lower blood pressure. The limited human evidence suggests higher HDL-cholesterol concentrations and lower triacylglycerol concentrations but no effect on blood pressure. In terms of cancer risk, there is no human evidence to date, yet animal studies found decreases in lymphoma incidence, longer survival after tumor inoculation, and lower rates of proliferation of several cell types. The findings in animals suggest that ADF may effectively modulate several risk factors, thereby preventing chronic disease, and that ADF may modulate disease risk to an extent similar to that of CR. More research is required to establish definitively the consequences of ADF.
热量限制(CR)和隔日禁食(ADF)是两种不同形式的饮食限制。尽管此前已对热量限制对慢性病预防的影响进行了综述,但隔日禁食对慢性病风险的影响尚未得到总结。因此,我们在此综述关于隔日禁食与某些慢性病风险(如2型糖尿病、心血管疾病和癌症)的动物和人类证据。我们还比较了隔日禁食与热量限制所带来的风险降低幅度。在糖尿病风险方面,隔日禁食的动物研究发现糖尿病发病率较低,空腹血糖和胰岛素浓度也较低,这些效果与热量限制相当。迄今为止的人体试验报告显示胰岛素介导的葡萄糖摄取增加,但对空腹血糖或胰岛素浓度没有影响。在心血管疾病风险方面,动物隔日禁食数据显示总胆固醇和三酰甘油浓度较低、心率较低、心肌梗死后心脏反应改善以及血压较低。有限的人体证据表明高密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度较高,三酰甘油浓度较低,但对血压没有影响。在癌症风险方面,迄今为止尚无人体证据,但动物研究发现淋巴瘤发病率降低、肿瘤接种后生存期延长以及几种细胞类型的增殖率降低。动物研究结果表明,隔日禁食可能有效调节多种风险因素,从而预防慢性病,并且隔日禁食对疾病风险的调节程度可能与热量限制相似。需要更多研究来明确隔日禁食的后果。