Suppr超能文献

使用个人数字助理记录药剂师的干预措施:一项文献综述。

Use of personal digital assistants for documentation of pharmacists' interventions: a literature review.

作者信息

Fox Brent I, Felkey Bill G, Berger Bruce A, Krueger Kem P, Rainer Rex Kelly

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Care Systems, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jul 15;64(14):1516-25. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060152.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The literature describing pharmacists' use of personal digital assistants (PDAs) as intervention documentation tools in health systems is reviewed.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts to find articles whose title and abstract indicated that the articles' content addressed pharmacists' use of PDAs as intervention documentation tools. Qualitative analyses were conducted to characterize the existing literature on pharmacists' use of PDAs to document interventions in health systems. The articles were categorized using eight characteristics: study type, objective, setting, participants, PDA platform, documentation software, results, and conclusions.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles were included in this review. All articles were classified as descriptive. Two studies lacked objectives, while 10 contained explicitly stated objectives or objectives that could be inferred from article content. The majority of implementation processes occurred in acute care teaching facilities. All study participants were pharmacists. The majority of articles described PDA-based documentation by more than one pharmacist. Results from the articles can be divided into four categories: no measurable comparison performed, anecdotal comparison performed, survey data reported, and measurable comparison performed. Three articles specifically presented information regarding security and confidentiality of patient information. Each article described the use of password protection for the PDAs.

CONCLUSION

The use of PDAs may increase the frequency and number of interventions documented by pharmacists; however, there is a lack of well-designed studies reporting the overall outcomes of using PDAs for intervention documentation by pharmacists.

摘要

目的

对描述药剂师在医疗系统中使用个人数字助理(PDA)作为干预记录工具的文献进行综述。

方法

使用MEDLINE和《国际药学文摘》进行文献检索,以查找标题和摘要表明文章内容涉及药剂师使用PDA作为干预记录工具的文章。进行定性分析以描述有关药剂师使用PDA记录医疗系统干预措施的现有文献。文章根据八个特征进行分类:研究类型、目的、环境、参与者、PDA平台、记录软件、结果和结论。

结果

本综述共纳入12篇文章。所有文章均归类为描述性文章。两项研究缺乏目的,而10项研究包含明确陈述的目的或可从文章内容推断出的目的。大多数实施过程发生在急性护理教学机构。所有研究参与者均为药剂师。大多数文章描述了不止一名药剂师基于PDA的记录。文章结果可分为四类:未进行可测量的比较、进行了轶事比较、报告了调查数据以及进行了可测量的比较。三篇文章专门介绍了有关患者信息安全和保密的信息。每篇文章都描述了对PDA使用密码保护。

结论

使用PDA可能会增加药剂师记录的干预措施的频率和数量;然而,缺乏精心设计的研究报告药剂师使用PDA进行干预记录的总体结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验