学生药剂师在社区非教学医院高级药学实践经验中的临床干预措施。
Student pharmacists' clinical interventions in advanced pharmacy practice experiences at a community nonteaching hospital.
作者信息
Shogbon Angela O, Lundquist Lisa M
机构信息
College of Pharmacy, Mercer University, Atlanta, Georgia.
出版信息
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Apr 17;78(3):50. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78350.
OBJECTIVE
To assess student pharmacists' clinical interventions in advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) at a community nonteaching hospital and evaluate completed interventions based on the type of documentation method used.
METHODS
Clinical interventions of 120 fourth-year (P4) student pharmacists in advanced institutional, medication safety, or internal medicine APPEs were collected over a 3½-year period. Clinical interventions were analyzed for cost savings, intervention type, and acceptance rates. A secondary analysis of paper-based vs electronic-based documentation of completed interventions was performed.
RESULTS
There were 2,170 clinical interventions attempted with an acceptance rate of 97%. The estimated cost savings was $280,297. A comparable number of interventions and cost savings per student was observed between paper-based and electronic-based documentation methods.
CONCLUSION
Student pharmacists at a community nonteaching hospital have many opportunities for participation in patient-centered activities, and for interaction and collaboration with other healthcare professionals. They can significantly benefit patient care through clinical interventions, while also contributing to cost savings for the institution.
目的
评估社区非教学医院中实习药剂师在高级药学实践经验（APPEs）中的临床干预情况，并根据所使用的记录方法类型对已完成的干预措施进行评估。
方法
在3年半的时间里收集了120名四年级（P4）实习药剂师在高级机构、药物安全或内科APPEs中的临床干预情况。对临床干预措施进行成本节约、干预类型和接受率分析。对已完成干预措施的纸质记录与电子记录进行二次分析。
结果
共尝试了2170次临床干预，接受率为97%。估计节约成本280297美元。在纸质记录和电子记录方法之间，观察到每名学生的干预次数和成本节约情况相当。
结论
社区非教学医院的实习药剂师有很多机会参与以患者为中心的活动，以及与其他医疗保健专业人员进行互动和协作。他们可以通过临床干预显著改善患者护理，同时也为机构节约成本做出贡献。
Zotero 插件