Tropé Claes, Kaern Janne
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, Oslo, Norway.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 10;25(20):2909-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1013.
This overview summarizes studies with acceptable quality and validity and presents a synthesis of the effectiveness on adjuvant therapy after surgery for early ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.
The literature published between 1970 and 2006 was identified systematically by computer-based searches in MEDLINE and Cochrane library.
Twenty-two prospective randomized studies were analyzed, which included 4,626 patients. No difference between adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and radiotherapy was found. There is agreement on that patients with stage IA, grade 1 tumors have excellent survival and do not need postsurgical therapy. The International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm 1/Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm trials were the first to show an effect on survival of AC, but in patients with adequate surgical staging, there was no additional effect of AC. For patients who are staged incompletely at the time of initial surgery, completion of the staging procedure with either laparoscopy or laparotomy is a reasonable approach before a final decision is made regarding the need for AC. If full staging cannot be performed due to medical contraindication or patient refusal, consideration of AC is reasonable in selected patients. Using prognostic variables such as grade, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics substage, pretreatment of CA-125 < or = 30 U/mL, and DNA ploidy, it is possible to divide patients into risk groups to avoid overtreatment. Gynecologic Oncology Group study 157 suggests that it may be possible to minimize chemotherapy-induced toxicity by using three instead of six cycles of AC, although it is not known fully whether this will compromise effectiveness.
Future randomized studies in EOC will include the investigation of new targeted therapies and new prognostic factors in adequately staged patients.
本综述总结了质量和有效性可接受的研究,并对早期卵巢癌(EOC)患者术后辅助治疗的有效性进行了综合分析。
通过在MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆进行基于计算机的检索,系统地识别了1970年至2006年间发表的文献。
分析了22项前瞻性随机研究,共纳入4626例患者。未发现辅助化疗(AC)与放疗之间存在差异。IA期、1级肿瘤患者生存率极佳且无需术后治疗,这一点已达成共识。国际卵巢癌协作组1/卵巢癌辅助化疗试验首次显示AC对生存率有影响,但在手术分期充分的患者中,AC并无额外效果。对于初次手术时分期不完全的患者,在就是否需要AC做出最终决定之前,通过腹腔镜检查或剖腹手术完成分期程序是一种合理的方法。如果由于医学禁忌或患者拒绝而无法进行全面分期,在选定的患者中考虑AC是合理的。使用分级、国际妇产科联盟亚分期、CA-125预处理<或=30 U/mL以及DNA倍体等预后变量,可以将患者分为风险组以避免过度治疗。妇科肿瘤学组研究157表明,使用三个而非六个周期的AC可能会将化疗引起的毒性降至最低,尽管尚不完全清楚这是否会影响疗效。
未来EOC的随机研究将包括对分期充分的患者进行新的靶向治疗和新的预后因素的研究。