• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Comparison of clinical efficacy of rokitamycin (RKM) and ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double-blind method. The Research Committee for the Effect of Rokitamycin, Research Group for Infectious Enteritis].

作者信息

Obana M, Tomizawa I, Takizawa Y, Nitta Y, Sagara H, Seo T, Sato J, Tsunoda T, Ota S, Machii A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital.

出版信息

Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1991 Sep;65(9):1165-82. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.1165.

DOI:10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.1165
PMID:1761896
Abstract

The clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of Rokitamycin (RKM), a new macrolide antibiotic, were compared with those of Ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double blind method. The daily dose level of RKM or OFLX was 600 mg. They were orally administered in three divided doses for 5 days. Of 223 cases studied, 106 cases were diagnosed as Campylobacter enteritis. Ninety cases (RKM group: 50, OFLX group: 40) except for 16 excluded or drop-out cases were analysed. There was no significant difference between the two groups in any background factors. The effectiveness and usefulness was evaluated in 88 cases (RKM group: 48, OFLX group: 40). The results obtained were as follows: 1. In a total of 82 strains of Campylobacter jejuni/coli (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 40), the bacteriological efficacy rate of RKM (95.2%) was superior to that of OFLX (70.0%) with a significant difference (p = 0.006). 2. In 76 symptomatic patients (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 34) on the day of the beginning of drug administration, the clinical efficacy rate was 97.6% in the RKM group and 85.3% in the OFLX group with no significant difference between the two groups. 3. In 88 evaluable patients, the global clinical efficacy rate of RKM (95.8%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). 4. Side effect was observed in 1 (1.9%) of the 54 patients in the RKM group and none of the 44 patients in the OFLX group. Slightly abnormal laboratory findings were seen in 4 (10.8%) of the 37 patients treated with RKM and 3 (9.7%) of the 31 patients treated with OFLX, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. 5. In 88 evaluable patients, the clinical usefulness of RKM (91.7%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p = 0.01). From these results, RKM is considered to be a very useful agent for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Comparison of clinical efficacy of rokitamycin (RKM) and ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double-blind method. The Research Committee for the Effect of Rokitamycin, Research Group for Infectious Enteritis].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1991 Sep;65(9):1165-82. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.1165.
2
[A clinical experience of rokitamycin on Campylobacter enteritis. Research Group of Rokitamycin on Infectious Enteritis].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1991 Sep;65(9):1153-64. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.1153.
3
[Evaluation of effectiveness of rokitamycin dry syrup in acute enteritis in pediatrics. A comparative study on rokitamycin and fosfomycin dry syrups].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1990 Feb;43(2):257-84.
4
[Microbiological, pharmacokinetic and clinical studies of rokitamycin dry syrup in the pediatric field].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1988 Jul;41(7):920-59.
5
[Clinical studies on the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis--emergence of quinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni after treatment with new quinolones].[空肠弯曲菌肠炎治疗的临床研究——新型喹诺酮类药物治疗后耐喹诺酮空肠弯曲菌的出现]
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1992 Jul;66(7):923-9. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.66.923.
6
[In vitro antimicrobial activity of rokitamycin, a macrolide antibacterial agent, against clinically isolated strains of Campylobacter and other enteritis-causing bacteria].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1991 Oct;65(10):1325-30. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.1325.
7
[Laboratory and clinical studies of rokitamycin dry syrup in the field of pediatrics].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1988 Jul;41(7):875-84.
8
[Comparison of clinical efficacy of lomefloxacin (LFLX, NY-198) and pipemidic acid (PPA) in the treatment of infectious enteritis by a double-blind method. The Japan Research Committee of Lomefloxacin Research Group Enteritis].洛美沙星(LFLX,NY - 198)与吡哌酸(PPA)治疗感染性肠炎的双盲法临床疗效比较。洛美沙星研究组肠炎日本研究委员会
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1989 Jun;63(6):606-22. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.63.606.
9
[Studies on efficacy, safety and dosage of rokitamycin in the treatment of pediatric infections].罗他霉素治疗小儿感染的疗效、安全性及剂量研究
Jpn J Antibiot. 1988 Jun;41(6):712-9.
10
[Clinical and pharmacokinetic studies of rokitamycin in children].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1988 Jun;41(6):686-95.