Aoki T, Shimizu N, Tomizawa I, Takizawa Y, Matsubara Y, Nitta Y, Sagara H, Seo T, Kanehisa N, Murata M
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1989 Jun;63(6):606-22. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.63.606.
The clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of lomefloxacin (LFLX, NY-198), a new quinolone antimicrobial agent, were compared with those of pipemidic acid (PPA) in the treatment of infectious enteritis (bacillary dysentery, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli enteritis and Campylobacter enteritis) by a double blind method. Daily dosage of LFLX and PPA was 600 mg and 2000 mg, respectively administered orally divided into 4 doses. The duration of the treatment was 5 days. Of 290 cases studied, 100 cases were excluded and 21 cases were dropped from analysis of effectiveness and usefulness. The effectiveness and usefulness was evaluated in 169 cases (LFLX group: 83, PPA group: 86). There was no significance difference between the two groups in any background characteristics. The results obtained were as follows: 1. In 73 symptomatic patients (LFLX group: 35, PPA group: 38) on the day of the beginning of administration, the clinical effect was 91.4% in the LFLX group and 84.2% in the PPA group with no significant difference between the two groups. 2. In a total of 184 strains (LFLX group: 90, PPA group: 94), the bacteriological effects of LFLX (93.3%) was superior to that of PPA (80.9%) with significant difference (p = 0.0153). 3. In 169 evaluable patients, the global clinical effects of LFLX (92.8%) was superior to that of PPA (79.1%) with a significant difference (P = 0.0144). 4. Side effects were observed in 1 (0.7%) of the 141 patients in the LFLX group and none of the 143 patients in the PPA group. Abnormal laboratory test values were noted in 10 (7.6%) of the 132 patients treated with FLLX and 7 (5.1%) of the 136 patients treated with PPA, but they as no significant difference between the two groups. 5. In 169 evaluable patients, the clinical usefulness of LFLX (91.6%) was superior to that of PPA (76.7%) with a significant difference (P = 0.0111). From these results, LFLX is considered to be a clinically useful medicine in the treatment of infectious enteritis including bacillary dysentery.
采用双盲法比较了新型喹诺酮类抗菌药物洛美沙星(LFLX,NY - 198)与吡哌酸(PPA)治疗感染性肠炎(细菌性痢疾、致病性大肠杆菌肠炎和弯曲菌肠炎)的临床疗效、安全性和实用性。LFLX和PPA的日剂量分别为600mg和2000mg,均口服给药,分4次服用。治疗疗程为5天。在研究的290例病例中,100例被排除,21例未纳入有效性和实用性分析。对169例患者(LFLX组:83例,PPA组:86例)进行了有效性和实用性评估。两组在任何背景特征方面均无显著差异。结果如下:1. 在给药首日有症状的73例患者(LFLX组:35例,PPA组:38例)中,LFLX组的临床有效率为91.4%,PPA组为84.2%,两组之间无显著差异。2. 在总共184株菌株(LFLX组:90株,PPA组:94株)中,LFLX的细菌学有效率(93.3%)优于PPA(80.9%),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0153)。3. 在169例可评估患者中,LFLX的总体临床有效率(92.8%)优于PPA(79.1%),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0144)。4. LFLX组141例患者中有1例(0.7%)出现副作用,PPA组143例患者均未出现。接受FLLX治疗的132例患者中有10例(7.6%)实验室检查值异常,接受PPA治疗的136例患者中有7例(5.1%)出现异常,但两组之间无显著差异。5. 在169例可评估患者中,LFLX的临床实用性(91.6%)优于PPA(76.7%),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0111)。从这些结果来看,洛美沙星被认为是治疗包括细菌性痢疾在内的感染性肠炎的一种临床有用药物。