Plesnila Nikolaus
Laboratory of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery and Institute for Surgical Research, University of Munich Medical Center, Grosshadern, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:393-400. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)61028-5.
Among the secondary events occurring after traumatic brain injury (TBI) pathologically increased intracranial pressure (ICP) correlates most closely with poor outcome. In addition to infusion of hypertonic solutions, e.g. mannitol, and other medical measures, decompression of the brain by surgical removal of a portion of the cranium (craniectomy) has been used for many decades as an intuitive strategy for the treatment of post-traumatic ICP increase. The lack of evidence-based clinical and controversial experimental data, however, resulted in decompressive craniectomy to be recommended by most national and international guidelines only as a third tier therapy for the treatment of pathologically elevated ICP. Ongoing clinical trials on the use of decompressive craniectomy after TBI may clarify many aspects of the clinical application of this technique, however, some important pathophysiological issues, e.g. the timing of decompression craniectomy, its effect on brain edema formation, and its role for secondary brain damage, are still widely discussed and can only be addressed in experimental settings. The aim of the current review was therefore to summarize and discuss recent experimental data dealing with the use of decompression craniectomy following TBI. The present results suggest that surgical decompression effectively prevents secondary brain damage when performed early enough. Although caution should be taken when transferring conclusions drawn from experimental settings to the clinical situation, the current literature suggests that the timing of decompression may be of utmost importance in order to exploit the full neuroprotective potential of craniectomy following TBI.
在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后发生的继发性事件中,病理性颅内压(ICP)升高与不良预后的相关性最为密切。除了输注高渗溶液(如甘露醇)和采取其他医疗措施外,通过手术切除部分颅骨(颅骨切除术)来进行脑减压,作为治疗创伤后ICP升高的直观策略,已经使用了数十年。然而,由于缺乏循证医学临床证据以及存在有争议的实验数据,大多数国家和国际指南仅将颅骨切除术推荐为治疗病理性ICP升高的三线治疗方法。目前正在进行的关于TBI后使用颅骨切除术的临床试验可能会阐明该技术临床应用的许多方面,然而,一些重要的病理生理问题,如颅骨切除术的时机、其对脑水肿形成的影响以及其在继发性脑损伤中的作用,仍在广泛讨论中,并且只能在实验环境中进行研究。因此,本综述的目的是总结和讨论近期有关TBI后使用颅骨切除术的实验数据。目前的结果表明,手术减压如果进行得足够早,可以有效预防继发性脑损伤。尽管将从实验环境得出的结论应用于临床情况时应谨慎,但当前文献表明,减压时机可能至关重要,以便充分发挥TBI后颅骨切除术的神经保护潜力。