Altmann Tanya K
Division of Nursing, Sacramento State University, Sacramento CA, USA.
Contemp Nurse. 2007 May-Jun;25(1-2):114-23. doi: 10.5172/conu.2007.25.1-2.114.
The purpose of this article is to review the seminal work of Patricia Benner, From Novice to Expert, in order to assert it as a philosophy and not a theory. In the literature there is no clear consensus on where this model stands - theory or philosophy. There is no intent to devalue Patricia Benner's work as it is valuable and has become widely used in nursing practice, research, education and administration. However, as a philosophy, Benner's interpretive work is more constructive. Appropriate use of this model requires an understanding of whether it is a theory or a philosophy, its underpinnings and an assessment of its development and testing. This can be accomplished by knowing the differences between a theory and a philosophy and by reviewing the ways of knowing and processes of reasoning which are necessary for skill acquisition. Much of the critique of Benner's work falls into two categories: it is not quantitative research and there are issues with the use of narratives. These will be reviewed. Judgment and understanding of the nature of Benner's model allows for its appropriate use in journal articles, research, or other projects and/or modification as necessary.
本文旨在回顾帕特里夏·本纳的开创性著作《从新手到专家》,以便将其确立为一种哲学而非理论。在文献中,对于该模型属于理论还是哲学并没有明确的共识。无意贬低帕特里夏·本纳的作品,因为其很有价值且已在护理实践、研究、教育和管理中广泛应用。然而,作为一种哲学,本纳的解释性作品更具建设性。正确使用该模型需要理解它是理论还是哲学、其基础以及对其发展和检验的评估。这可以通过了解理论与哲学之间的差异以及回顾技能习得所需的认知方式和推理过程来实现。对本纳作品的批评大多分为两类:它不是定量研究以及叙事的使用存在问题。这些将予以回顾。对本纳模型性质的判断和理解有助于在期刊文章、研究或其他项目中正确使用它,并在必要时进行修改。