Yahata T, Aoki Y, Tanaka K
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007;28(3):193-5.
This study evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) in preoperative detection of myometrial invasion by endometrial cancer. We also evaluated the results of gross visual inspection (GVI) of surgical specimens compared with histopathological diagnosis. One hundred and seventy-seven women underwent preoperative pelvic MRI, TVUS, and intraoperative GVI. Myometrial tumor invasion was evaluated histologically and classified as absent (depth a), superficial (depth b: < or = 50% invasion), or deep (depth c: > 50% invasion). The accuracy of MRI, TVUS, and GVI were 64.0, 66.9, and 63.8%, respectively. The positive predictive values of of each modality for depth a were 52.6, 51.4, and 52.2%, respectively. The accuracy of each in detecting deep myometrial invasion (depth c) were 84.0, 86.9, 83.1%. Although evaluation of depth a was limited with all modalities, MRI and TVUS were shown to be reliable for preoperative evaluation of deep myometrial invasion. The high accuracy of these three methods suggests that they are useful either interchangeably or in combination.
本研究评估了磁共振成像(MRI)和经阴道超声检查(TVUS)在术前检测子宫内膜癌肌层浸润方面的准确性。我们还将手术标本的大体视觉检查(GVI)结果与组织病理学诊断结果进行了比较。177名女性接受了术前盆腔MRI、TVUS及术中GVI检查。对肌层肿瘤浸润进行组织学评估,并分为无浸润(深度a)、浅肌层浸润(深度b:浸润≤50%)或深肌层浸润(深度c:浸润>50%)。MRI、TVUS和GVI的准确性分别为64.0%、66.9%和63.8%。各检查方法对深度a的阳性预测值分别为52.6%、51.4%和52.2%。各检查方法检测深肌层浸润(深度c)的准确性分别为84.0%、86.9%、83.1%。尽管所有检查方法对深度a的评估都有限,但MRI和TVUS在术前评估深肌层浸润方面显示出可靠性。这三种方法的高准确性表明它们可互换使用或联合使用。