Suppr超能文献

关于基于科学研究的指南的批判性评论

[Critical remarks regarding guidelines based on scientific research].

作者信息

Nieweg O E

机构信息

Het Nederlands Kanker Instituut/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, afd. Heelkunde, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Jun 9;151(23):1272-5.

Abstract

National and international guidelines for diagnosis and treatment are increasingly applied as standards for medical interventions. Evidence-based consensus guidelines are not consistently based on the outcome of scientific studies. Recent research yielding inherent low-grade evidence is liable to be overruled by personal impressions, sentiments and common sense. Guidelines are based on the average patient, with a certain range. With increasing specialisation, one increasingly sees that doctors justifiably digress from a guideline when a patient differs substantially from the average.

摘要

国家和国际诊断与治疗指南越来越多地被用作医疗干预的标准。基于证据的共识性指南并非始终基于科学研究的结果。近期产生内在低级别证据的研究容易被个人印象、情感和常识所否决。指南是基于一定范围内的普通患者制定的。随着专业化程度的提高,人们越来越多地看到,当患者与普通患者有很大差异时,医生有理由偏离指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验