• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大肠广基息肉内镜切除所需的工作及资源

Work and resources needed for endoscopic resection of large sessile colorectal polyps.

作者信息

Overhiser Andrew J, Rex Douglas K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1076-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.022. Epub 2007 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.022
PMID:17625979
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Large sessile colon polyps often are referred for surgical resection, even when amenable to endoscopic resection. The aim of this study was to describe the resource use of endoscopic resection of large sessile colon polyps compared with small polyps with respect to physician time and equipment use.

METHODS

Retrospectively, procedure time, medication use, and equipment use were recorded for 184 consecutive patients with sessile colorectal polyps 2 cm or larger in size and for 184 consecutive control patients with only sessile polyps less than 2 cm in size or pedunculated polyps.

RESULTS

The mean duration of colonoscopy in patients with large sessile colon polyps averaged 51.4 (SD, 25.6) minutes compared with 20.0 (SD, 8.6) minutes for the control group (P < .0001). The large-polyp group required much more equipment to complete the polypectomy (eg, injection catheters and cautery probes) (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the costs of endoscopic large sessile adenoma resection in physician work and equipment are substantially greater than the costs of resection of small adenomas. These costs may be a deterrent to endoscopic resection of large sessile adenomas and may warrant increased reimbursement for those procedures, particularly if predictions that colonoscopic procedures will become more complex in the future are realized.

摘要

背景与目的

大型无蒂结肠息肉即便适合内镜切除,通常也会被转诊进行手术切除。本研究旨在比较大型无蒂结肠息肉与小型息肉在内镜切除方面医生时间和设备使用的资源利用情况。

方法

回顾性记录了连续184例大小为2厘米或更大的无蒂结直肠息肉患者以及连续184例仅有无蒂息肉小于2厘米或有蒂息肉的对照患者的手术时间、药物使用情况和设备使用情况。

结果

大型无蒂结肠息肉患者的结肠镜检查平均时长为5至1.4(标准差25.6)分钟,而对照组为20.0(标准差8.6)分钟(P < 0.0001)。大型息肉组完成息肉切除术需要更多设备(如注射导管和电灼探头)(P < 0.0001)。

结论

我们的结果表明,内镜下大型无蒂腺瘤切除在医生工作和设备方面的成本远高于小型腺瘤切除的成本。这些成本可能会阻碍大型无蒂腺瘤的内镜切除,可能需要提高这些手术的报销额度,特别是如果未来结肠镜检查程序会变得更加复杂的预测得以实现。

相似文献

1
Work and resources needed for endoscopic resection of large sessile colorectal polyps.大肠广基息肉内镜切除所需的工作及资源
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1076-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.022. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
2
Colonoscopic polypectomy in retroflexion.结肠镜逆行弯曲下息肉切除术
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan;63(1):144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.016.
3
Endoscopic snare resection of large colonic polyps: how far can we go?大肠大息肉的内镜圈套切除术:我们能走多远?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003 Mar;18(2):131-5. doi: 10.1007/s00384-002-0450-3. Epub 2002 Nov 16.
4
Treatment patterns and costs associated with sessile colorectal polyps.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Nov;97(11):2896-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07058.x.
5
Endoclip-assisted resection of large pedunculated colon polyps.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Sep;50(3):405-6. doi: 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.95723.
6
Colonoscopic resection of large colonic polyps--a prospective study.大肠大息肉的结肠镜切除术——一项前瞻性研究。
Isr J Med Sci. 1997 Dec;33(12):777-80.
7
An evaluation of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies.使用高倍放大染色结肠镜对结直肠内镜黏膜切除术的评估:1000例结肠镜检查的前瞻性研究。
Endoscopy. 2004 Jun;36(6):491-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814397.
8
[Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps].[内镜下切除大肠大息肉]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Aug;129(4):291-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-822832.
9
Endoscopic snare excision of large pedunculated colorectal polyps: a new, safe, and effective technique.内镜圈套器切除大肠带蒂大息肉:一种新的、安全有效的技术。
Endoscopy. 2001 Oct;33(10):854-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17329.
10
Retroflexion in the colon: a useful and safe technique in the evaluation and resection of sessile polyps during colonoscopy.结肠内翻:结肠镜检查期间评估和切除无蒂息肉的一种有用且安全的技术。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul;101(7):1479-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00606.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends.复杂结直肠息肉的内镜治疗:当前见解与未来趋势
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 20;8:728704. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.728704. eCollection 2021.
2
Effect of time of day and daily endoscopic workload on outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps.结肠镜下大肠巨大平坦息肉黏膜切除术的日间时间和每日内镜工作量对治疗效果的影响。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb;7(1):146-154. doi: 10.1177/2050640618804724. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
3
Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps can reduce post-procedure abdominal pain: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
大肠大息肉内镜切除术中二氧化碳注入可减轻术后腹痛:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Aug;6(7):1089-1098. doi: 10.1177/2050640618776740. Epub 2018 May 4.
4
Facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection: double balloon endolumenal platform significantly improves dissection time compared with conventional technique (with video).辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术:双球囊内镜腔内平台与传统技术相比显著缩短剥离时间(附有视频)。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6336-4. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
Is the double channel gastroscope useful in endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps?双通道胃镜在大肠广基息肉内镜黏膜切除术中是否有用?
Clin Endosc. 2015 Mar;48(2):89-90. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.2.89. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
6
Complex colon polypectomy.复杂结肠息肉切除术。
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2010 Jun;6(6):375-82.