• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是什么让医生成为与患者沟通的典范?

What makes a physician an exemplary communicator with patients?

作者信息

Laidlaw Toni Suzuki, Kaufman David M, Sargeant Joan, MacLeod Heather, Blake Kim, Simpson David

机构信息

Division of Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Canada.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.017. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.017
PMID:17628387
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A pilot study was conducted to examine the characteristics, capacities (beliefs, values and intentions) and skills that distinguish exemplary communicators from less exemplary communicators in patient-physician encounters.

METHODS

Forty physicians participated in a four-station videotaped OSCE focusing on a variety of adolescent sexual health issues and assessed using seven quantitative measures. Results determined the top 15%, and the bottom 15%. An interviewer reviewed and discussed two of the videotaped scenarios with physicians in both groups. Interviews were analyzed to determine differences between groups.

RESULTS

Results consistently identified the top 15% (6) and bottom 15% (6) physicians. The t-tests showed statistically significant differences on all skills and capacity measures. "Notable" differences (25% or higher) were found on two quantitative instruments assessing skills. There were no notable differences in capacities. The qualitative inquiry confirmed notable differences in skills and identified capacities of empathy, non-judgement and self-reflection as restricted to the exemplary group.

CONCLUSION

Using quantitative and qualitative measures, it is possible to determine skills and capacities that distinguish exemplary communicators from less exemplary communicators.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

In addition to effective skills, physician empathy, non-judgement and self-reflection appear to be necessary components for exemplary physician communication with adolescents.

摘要

目的

开展一项试点研究,以考察在医患交流中,能将模范沟通者与非模范沟通者区分开来的特征、能力(信念、价值观和意图)及技能。

方法

40名医生参与了一场四站式视频客观结构化临床考试(OSCE),该考试聚焦于各种青少年性健康问题,并使用七种定量测量方法进行评估。结果确定了前15%和后15%的医生。一名面试官与两组医生一起回顾并讨论了其中两个视频场景。对访谈进行分析以确定两组之间的差异。

结果

结果一致确定了前15%(6名)和后15%(6名)的医生。t检验显示,在所有技能和能力测量方面均存在统计学上的显著差异。在两项评估技能的定量工具上发现了“显著”差异(25%或更高)。在能力方面没有显著差异。定性调查证实了技能方面的显著差异,并确定同理心、无评判和自我反思能力仅限于模范组。

结论

使用定量和定性测量方法,可以确定能将模范沟通者与非模范沟通者区分开来的技能和能力。

实践意义

除有效的技能外,医生的同理心、无评判和自我反思似乎是与青少年进行模范沟通的必要组成部分。

相似文献

1
What makes a physician an exemplary communicator with patients?是什么让医生成为与患者沟通的典范?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.017. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
2
The impact of gender stereotypes on the evaluation of general practitioners' communication skills: an experimental study using transcripts of physician-patient encounters.性别刻板印象对全科医生沟通技巧评估的影响:一项使用医患交流记录的实验研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.013. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
3
Doctor-patient communication in primary care with an interpreter: physician perceptions of professional and family interpreters.在基层医疗中通过口译员进行的医患沟通:医生对专业口译员和家属口译员的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
4
How patient-centred am I? A new method to measure physicians' patient-centredness.我以患者为中心的程度如何?一种衡量医生以患者为中心程度的新方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.017. Epub 2005 Jul 15.
5
Intercultural communication competence in family medicine: lessons from the field.家庭医学中的跨文化交流能力:来自该领域的经验教训。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 May;61(2):236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.002. Epub 2005 Jun 20.
6
Provider and patient perspectives regarding health care for war-related health concerns.医疗服务提供者和患者对与战争相关的健康问题的医疗保健的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Sep;68(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 May 29.
7
Experiences of carrying out talking therapy in general practice: a qualitative interview study.在全科医疗中开展谈话治疗的经验:一项定性访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.020. Epub 2008 May 9.
8
The Four Habits Coding Scheme: validation of an instrument to assess clinicians' communication behavior.四种习惯编码方案:评估临床医生沟通行为工具的验证
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.015. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
9
Physician smoking status, attitudes toward smoking, and cessation advice to patients: an international survey.医生的吸烟状况、对吸烟的态度以及对患者的戒烟建议:一项国际调查。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.042. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
10
Identification of nutrition communication styles and strategies: a qualitative study among Dutch GPs.营养沟通方式与策略的识别:一项针对荷兰全科医生的定性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.001. Epub 2006 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Understanding of Reflexivity in Family Medicine: Development of an Educational Tool Based on a Rapid Review.提高对家庭医学中反思性的理解:基于快速综述开发一种教育工具。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Jul 19;10:181. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000181.1. eCollection 2021.
2
Medical Communication Perceived Self-Efficacy (ME-CO) Scale: Construction and Validation of a New Measuring Instrument from a Socio-Cognitive Perspective.医学沟通自我效能感(ME-CO)量表:基于社会认知视角构建与验证一种新的测量工具
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Jul 11;12(7):765-780. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12070056.
3
A qualitative exploration of participant and investigator perspectives from the TRED-HF trial.
TRED-HF 试验中参与者和研究者观点的定性探讨。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3760-3768. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13524. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Understanding compassion in family medicine: a qualitative study.理解家庭医学中的同情心:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Mar;69(680):e208-e216. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701285. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
5
A Simulation-Based Workshop to Improve Dermatologists' Communication Skills: A Pilot for Continuing Medical Education.基于模拟的提高皮肤科医生沟通技巧工作坊:继续医学教育试点项目
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019 Mar;9(1):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s13555-018-0270-1. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
6
An Inquiry Into the Early Careers of Master Clinicians.对临床大师早期职业生涯的探究。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Oct;10(5):500-506. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00208.1.
7
Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS(®) clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do.评估 CAHPS(®)临床医生和小组调查以及补充项目中的沟通项目的内容,以及高绩效医生表示他们所做的事情。
Patient. 2013;6(3):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0016-1.
8
Comparison of the medical students' perceived self-efficacy and the evaluation of the observers and patients.医学生自我效能感的比较及观察者和患者的评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Apr 8;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-49.
9
Relationships and emotional wellbeing among African American and White advanced cancer caregivers.非裔美国人和白人晚期癌症照顾者之间的关系和情感健康。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.023. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
10
Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study.医学生微表情识别训练:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jul 20;9:47. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-47.