• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估连续心输出量和脉搏轮廓心输出量在跟踪容量负荷引起的心指数变化时的准确性。

Assessment of the accuracy of continuous cardiac output and pulse contour cardiac output in tracking cardiac index changes induced by volume load.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Crit Care. 2007 Aug;20(3):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2007.05.003
PMID:17629491
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ability to track changes in cardiac index (Delta CI) induced by volume loading using continuous pulsed heat thermodilution (CCO), and pulse contour (PCCO) cardiac output (CO) with transpulmonary thermodilution (TD(tp)) CO as reference.

DESIGN

Prospective observational clinical trial.

SETTING

Intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Twelve ventilated and sedated post-operative cardiac surgery patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Each patient had a 7.5F CCO pulmonary artery catheter (Edwards Lifesciences) and a 5F, 20 cm PCCO femoral artery catheter (Pulsion Medical Systems). Forty-five data sets were taken before and after 25 volume loadings of 5 mL/kg of 4% albumin. Volume loading resulted in an increase in CI (2.84 L/(min m(2)) versus 3.12L/(min m(2)), p<.05) although only nine volume loadings changed CI (Delta CI)> or =14%. The change in CI using PCCO (Delta PCCI) was correlated with Delta CI (TD(tp)) (R(2)=.50, p<.0001), whilst Delta CI using CCO (Delta CCI) was not (R(2)=.14). The bias and limits of agreement (LOA) between Delta TD(tp)CI and Delta PCCI was 6.2% (95% CI, +/-5.8%) and 28.4% (95% CI, +/-38.2%) respectively. Delta TD(tp)CI and Delta CCI has a bias of 2.6% (95% CI, +/-8.3%) and LOA of 39.6% (95% CI, +/-63%). Both Delta PCCI and Delta CCI reliably tracked Delta CI> or =14%.

CONCLUSION

In this small group of patients the continuous cardiac output methods tracked changes in CI, although, in individual cases they did not change in the same direction as the thermodilution method. Critical care nurses need to critically appraise the accuracy and clinical relevance of continuous CO data within the clinical context.

摘要

目的

评估使用连续脉冲式热稀释法(CCO)和脉搏轮廓(PCCO)心输出量(CO)监测容量负荷诱导的心脏指数(Delta CI)变化的能力,以经肺温度稀释(TD(tp))CO 作为参考。

设计

前瞻性观察性临床试验。

设置

重症监护病房。

患者

12 例接受机械通气和镇静的心脏手术后患者。

测量和结果

每位患者均有 7.5F CCO 肺动脉导管(爱德华生命科学公司)和 5F、20cm PCCO 股动脉导管(普森医疗系统公司)。在 25 次 5mL/kg 4%白蛋白容量负荷前后共采集了 45 组数据。容量负荷导致 CI 增加(2.84 L/(min m2)与 3.12 L/(min m2)相比,p<.05),尽管只有 9 次容量负荷使 CI 发生变化(Delta CI)≥14%。使用 PCCO 的 CI 变化(Delta PCCI)与 Delta CI(TD(tp))相关(R2=0.50,p<.0001),而使用 CCO 的 CI 变化(Delta CCI)不相关(R2=0.14)。Delta TD(tp)CI 和 Delta PCCI 之间的偏差和一致性区间(LOA)分别为 6.2%(95% CI,+/-5.8%)和 28.4%(95% CI,+/-38.2%)。Delta TD(tp)CI 和 Delta CCI 的偏差为 2.6%(95% CI,+/-8.3%),LOA 为 39.6%(95% CI,+/-63%)。Delta PCCI 和 Delta CCI 均能可靠地追踪 Delta CI≥14%的变化。

结论

在这组小患者中,连续心输出量方法可监测 CI 的变化,但在个别情况下,它们的变化方向与热稀释法不一致。重症监护护士需要在临床环境中批判性地评估连续 CO 数据的准确性和临床相关性。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the accuracy of continuous cardiac output and pulse contour cardiac output in tracking cardiac index changes induced by volume load.评估连续心输出量和脉搏轮廓心输出量在跟踪容量负荷引起的心指数变化时的准确性。
Aust Crit Care. 2007 Aug;20(3):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
2
Cardiac output--pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution.心输出量——脉搏轮廓分析与肺动脉热稀释法对比
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Oct;50(9):1044-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01080.x.
3
Agreement between PiCCO pulse-contour analysis, pulmonal artery thermodilution and transthoracic thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery by-pass surgery.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术中脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)脉搏轮廓分析、肺动脉热稀释法和经胸热稀释法之间的一致性。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Oct;50(9):1050-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01118.x.
4
Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.一种基于动脉脉搏轮廓的新型心输出量测量装置的验证
Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1904-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275429.45312.8C.
5
Arterial pulse cardiac output agreement with thermodilution in patients in hyperdynamic conditions.高动力状态患者动脉脉搏心输出量与热稀释法的一致性
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Oct;22(5):681-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 May 14.
6
Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.两名患有胸内病变患者的肺动脉热稀释心输出量与经肺热稀释心输出量对比
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 May;48(5):658-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00375.x.
7
Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period.在长达6小时的免校准期内,血管张力变化对脉搏轮廓与经肺热稀释法心输出量测量值之间一致性的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):434-40. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.OB013E318161FEC4.
8
Transpulmonary versus continuous thermodilution cardiac output after valvular and coronary artery surgery.瓣膜和冠状动脉手术后经肺与连续热稀释法测量心输出量的比较
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;9(1):4-8. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.204545. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
9
Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.评估心输出量超声监测仪(USCOM)的临床实用性及其与热稀释法测量结果的一致性。
Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Sep;11(3):198-203.
10
Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.护士确定的心输出量评估。比较无创心输出量监测设备与肺动脉导管:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.心输出量监测的新方法。
World J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 26;6(9):1022-9. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.1022.