Intensive Care Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, NSW, Australia.
Aust Crit Care. 2007 Aug;20(3):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
To assess the ability to track changes in cardiac index (Delta CI) induced by volume loading using continuous pulsed heat thermodilution (CCO), and pulse contour (PCCO) cardiac output (CO) with transpulmonary thermodilution (TD(tp)) CO as reference.
Prospective observational clinical trial.
Intensive care unit.
Twelve ventilated and sedated post-operative cardiac surgery patients.
Each patient had a 7.5F CCO pulmonary artery catheter (Edwards Lifesciences) and a 5F, 20 cm PCCO femoral artery catheter (Pulsion Medical Systems). Forty-five data sets were taken before and after 25 volume loadings of 5 mL/kg of 4% albumin. Volume loading resulted in an increase in CI (2.84 L/(min m(2)) versus 3.12L/(min m(2)), p<.05) although only nine volume loadings changed CI (Delta CI)> or =14%. The change in CI using PCCO (Delta PCCI) was correlated with Delta CI (TD(tp)) (R(2)=.50, p<.0001), whilst Delta CI using CCO (Delta CCI) was not (R(2)=.14). The bias and limits of agreement (LOA) between Delta TD(tp)CI and Delta PCCI was 6.2% (95% CI, +/-5.8%) and 28.4% (95% CI, +/-38.2%) respectively. Delta TD(tp)CI and Delta CCI has a bias of 2.6% (95% CI, +/-8.3%) and LOA of 39.6% (95% CI, +/-63%). Both Delta PCCI and Delta CCI reliably tracked Delta CI> or =14%.
In this small group of patients the continuous cardiac output methods tracked changes in CI, although, in individual cases they did not change in the same direction as the thermodilution method. Critical care nurses need to critically appraise the accuracy and clinical relevance of continuous CO data within the clinical context.
评估使用连续脉冲式热稀释法(CCO)和脉搏轮廓(PCCO)心输出量(CO)监测容量负荷诱导的心脏指数(Delta CI)变化的能力,以经肺温度稀释(TD(tp))CO 作为参考。
前瞻性观察性临床试验。
重症监护病房。
12 例接受机械通气和镇静的心脏手术后患者。
每位患者均有 7.5F CCO 肺动脉导管(爱德华生命科学公司)和 5F、20cm PCCO 股动脉导管(普森医疗系统公司)。在 25 次 5mL/kg 4%白蛋白容量负荷前后共采集了 45 组数据。容量负荷导致 CI 增加(2.84 L/(min m2)与 3.12 L/(min m2)相比,p<.05),尽管只有 9 次容量负荷使 CI 发生变化(Delta CI)≥14%。使用 PCCO 的 CI 变化(Delta PCCI)与 Delta CI(TD(tp))相关(R2=0.50,p<.0001),而使用 CCO 的 CI 变化(Delta CCI)不相关(R2=0.14)。Delta TD(tp)CI 和 Delta PCCI 之间的偏差和一致性区间(LOA)分别为 6.2%(95% CI,+/-5.8%)和 28.4%(95% CI,+/-38.2%)。Delta TD(tp)CI 和 Delta CCI 的偏差为 2.6%(95% CI,+/-8.3%),LOA 为 39.6%(95% CI,+/-63%)。Delta PCCI 和 Delta CCI 均能可靠地追踪 Delta CI≥14%的变化。
在这组小患者中,连续心输出量方法可监测 CI 的变化,但在个别情况下,它们的变化方向与热稀释法不一致。重症监护护士需要在临床环境中批判性地评估连续 CO 数据的准确性和临床相关性。