• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无管经皮肾镜取石术——支架应成为其不可或缺的一部分吗?

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy--should a stent be an integral part?

作者信息

Mandhani Anil, Goyal Rajiv, Vijjan Vivek, Dubey Deepak, Kapoor Rakesh

机构信息

Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):921-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.021. Epub 2007 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.021
PMID:17632155
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared the outcome of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with or without Double-J(R) stent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to March 2006 patients with renal stones matched for age and stone size who underwent tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy were prospectively evaluated in 2 groups treated by 2 surgeons. Group 1 had a Double-J stent and group 2 did not. Inclusion criteria for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy included contralateral normal kidney, intact pelvicaliceal system, complete stone clearance under fluoroscopy and single infracostal puncture. These groups were compared for analgesic requirement, hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

During a period of 27 months 52 patients (57 renal units) underwent tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Group 1 had 25 (28 renal units) and group 2 had 27 patients (29 renal units). Mean stone volume was 4.34 +/- 2.12 cm(3) in group 1 and 4.14 +/- 1.14 cm(3) in group 2. Mean pain score was 2.96 +/- 1.24 and 2.82 +/- 0.81 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Analgesic (intramuscular or oral diclofenac sodium) requirement and mean hospital stay was comparable in groups 1 and 2, eg 170 +/- 110 vs 163.24 +/- 98.07 mg and 2.52 +/- 0.12 vs 2.35 +/- 0.12 days. Two patients in group 1 and 1 in group 2 had urinary leak from the percutaneous nephrolithotomy tract. Similarly 3 patients in group 1 had severe stent related problems and 1 required early removal of the Double-J stent.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding use of the Double-J stent may not compromise the safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

摘要

目的

我们比较了有无双J管的无管经皮肾镜取石术的结果。

材料与方法

2004年1月至2006年3月,对年龄和结石大小匹配、接受无管经皮肾镜取石术的肾结石患者进行前瞻性评估,分为两组,由两位外科医生治疗。第1组置入双J管,第2组未置入。无管经皮肾镜取石术的纳入标准包括对侧肾脏正常、肾盂肾盏系统完整、透视下结石完全清除以及单肋下穿刺。比较两组的镇痛需求、住院时间以及术中及术后并发症。

结果

在27个月期间,52例患者(57个肾单位)接受了无管经皮肾镜取石术。第1组25例(28个肾单位),第2组27例(29个肾单位)。第1组平均结石体积为4.34±2.12 cm³,第2组为4.14±1.14 cm³。第1组和第2组的平均疼痛评分分别为2.96±1.24和2.82±0.81。第1组和第2组的镇痛(肌肉注射或口服双氯芬酸钠)需求和平均住院时间相当,例如分别为170±110 vs 163.24±98.07 mg以及2.52±0.12 vs 2.35±0.12天。第1组有2例患者、第2组有1例患者出现经皮肾镜取石通道漏尿。同样,第1组有3例患者出现严重的支架相关问题,1例需要早期取出双J管。

结论

不使用双J管可能不会影响无管经皮肾镜取石术的安全性。

相似文献

1
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy--should a stent be an integral part?无管经皮肾镜取石术——支架应成为其不可或缺的一部分吗?
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):921-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.021. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
2
Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL.质疑无管经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)的合理性:早期拔管与无管经皮肾镜碎石术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(7):1045-8; discussion 1048-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09223.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
3
Use of absorbable gelatin sponge as an adjunct to "totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy".可吸收明胶海绵作为“完全无管经皮肾镜取石术”辅助材料的应用
Arch Esp Urol. 2009 Jul;62(6):423-9.
4
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless?经皮肾镜碎石术:肾盂造口术或无管或完全无管?
Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1043-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.104. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
5
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports.无管经皮肾镜取石术:一项前瞻性可行性研究及既往报告综述
BJU Int. 2005 Oct;96(6):879-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05730.x.
6
Fibrin sealant enables tubeless percutaneous stone surgery.纤维蛋白封闭剂可实现无管经皮肾镜取石术。
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):166-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000129211.71193.28.
7
Safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.双侧同期无管经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和有效性
Urology. 2005 Sep;66(3):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.064.
8
A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of fibrin sealant in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.一项评估纤维蛋白封闭剂在无管经皮肾镜取石术中安全性和有效性的前瞻性随机试验。
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2488-92; discussion 2492-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.148.
9
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal stone disease: single center experience.无管经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石疾病:单中心经验
Can J Urol. 2008 Jun;15(3):4072-6; discussion 4076-7.
10
Comparison of nephrostomy drainage types following percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: single tube versus multiple tubes versus tubeless.经皮肾镜取石术需建立多条通道后的肾造瘘引流类型比较:单管引流与多管引流与无管引流。
Urol Int. 2011;87(1):23-7. doi: 10.1159/000324264. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position.标准经皮肾镜取石术与仰卧位完全无管经皮肾镜取石术的比较。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jun 4;52(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01580-5.
2
Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones.完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术、无管化经皮肾镜取石术和有管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD012607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2.
3
Are hemostatic agents for selective cases of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy necessary for access tract control? A randomized control trial.
对于无管经皮肾镜取石术的特定病例,止血剂对于通道控制是否必要?一项随机对照试验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 May;55(5):1093-1100. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03492-6. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
4
Outcome of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elder patients: A single-center experience from a developing country.老年患者无管经皮肾镜取石术的结局:来自一个发展中国家的单中心经验。
J Clin Transl Res. 2022 Mar 19;8(2):160-165. eCollection 2022 Apr 29.
5
Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis.无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术:一项更新的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2.
6
A randomized controlled study comparing the standard, tubeless, and totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures for renal stones from a tertiary care hospital.一项来自三级护理医院的随机对照研究,比较标准经皮肾镜取石术、无管化经皮肾镜取石术和完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的效果。
Indian J Urol. 2017 Oct-Dec;33(4):310-314. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_52_17.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Large tube, small tube, tubeless, or totally tubeless?经皮肾镜取石术:大通道、小通道、无管化还是完全无管化?
Indian J Urol. 2013 Jul;29(3):219-24. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.117285.
8
Immediate postoperative morbidity in patients with indwelling double-J stent versus overnight-externalized ureteral catheter after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized study.经皮肾镜取石术后留置双 J 支架与隔夜外置输尿管导管患者的即刻术后发病率:一项前瞻性、随机研究。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Jun;41(3):253-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0555-x. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
9
Advances in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and patient selection: an update.无管经皮肾镜取石术及患者选择的进展:更新。
Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Apr;14(2):130-7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0310-4.
10
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.无管经皮肾镜取石术
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):16-24. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60438.