Cha Seung Heon, Kim Choongrak, Choi Byung Kwan, Kim Hak Jin, Baek Sun Yong
Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Pusan, Republic of Korea.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jul 15;32(16):1721-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180b9f29b.
Oblique view and screw coaxial fluoroscopy were used to assess cervical pedicle screw position in human cadaveric spine, results of which were compared with those of direct visual inspection by an anatomist.
To determine whether clinicians can detect misplaced cervical pedicle screws with accurate sensitivity and specificity using conventional C-arm equipment.
In the cervical region, pedicle screws have not been used so popularly as in lumbar or in thoracic regions. The reasons are related to the risk of inserting screw in small pedicle. So far, no method has been studied to assess the position of cervical pedicle screw during the operation.
Ten human cadavers were prepared for this study. Headed and nonheaded pedicle screws were inserted bilaterally from C3-C7. Using C-arm oblique and screw coaxial fluoroscopy, the depth of penetration was recorded in 2-dimension scale (superoinferior and mediolateral direction) by 6 different observers. The vertebrae were all harvested, and the penetration depth was recorded by an anatomist under direct visualization. The accuracy of C-arm measurements was analyzed. The results of nonheaded and headed screws also were compared.
A total of 98 pedicle screw positions were finally enrolled into the study. The oblique view can verify screw position with the sensitivity of 86.1% and specificity of 64.5%. Coaxial fluoroscopy had a sensitivity of 89.8% and a specificity of 56.9% in superoinferior direction. Mediolaterally coaxial fluoroscopy had a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 51.3%.
C-arm assessment of pedicle position has acceptable accuracy. With C-arm swing motion of the coaxial fluoroscopy, headed screws were also inspected without any difference as nonheaded screws. Measurements for superoinferior direction showed better sensitivity than those for mediolateral direction, which are supposed to be related to be elliptical shape and thin lateral margin of cervical pedicle.
采用斜位片和螺钉同轴透视法评估人体尸体颈椎椎弓根螺钉的位置,并将结果与解剖学家直接肉眼检查的结果进行比较。
确定临床医生使用传统C型臂设备能否以准确的敏感性和特异性检测出位置不当的颈椎椎弓根螺钉。
在颈椎区域,椎弓根螺钉的使用不如腰椎或胸椎区域普遍。原因与在小椎弓根中插入螺钉的风险有关。到目前为止,尚未研究出在手术过程中评估颈椎椎弓根螺钉位置的方法。
为该研究准备了10具人体尸体。从C3 - C7双侧插入有头和无头椎弓根螺钉。6名不同的观察者使用C型臂斜位片和螺钉同轴透视法,以二维尺度(上下和内外侧方向)记录进针深度。取出所有椎体,解剖学家在直接观察下记录进针深度。分析C型臂测量的准确性。还比较了无头和有头螺钉的结果。
最终共有98个椎弓根螺钉位置纳入研究。斜位片验证螺钉位置的敏感性为86.1%,特异性为64.5%。同轴透视在上下方向的敏感性为89.8%,特异性为56.9%。内外侧同轴透视的敏感性为70.0%,特异性为51.3%。
C型臂对椎弓根位置的评估具有可接受的准确性。通过同轴透视的C型臂摆动运动,有头螺钉与无头螺钉的检查结果无差异。上下方向的测量显示出比内外侧方向更好的敏感性,这可能与颈椎椎弓根的椭圆形形状和较薄的外侧边缘有关。