Subramanian S, Chiesa F, Lyubaev V, Aidarbekova A
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2006 Dec;26(6):309-16.
In spite of advancement in science, molecular medicine and target therapies, surgical treatment of metastases using different techniques, from selective neck dissection to extended radical neck dissections, form a major part in the management of neck metastases. This is due to the fact that, so far, there is no treatment more effective for resectable neck metastases, than surgery. Since most head and neck cancer patients die due to loco-regional progression of disease, and a very large majority of them do not live long enough to develop distant metastases, the status of neck lymph nodes remains the single most important prognostic factor, in these cases. In the 100 years since George Washington Crile described Radical Neck Dissection, we now have a much better understanding of the biological and clinical behaviour of neck metastases. This has ultimately led to the conservative approaches of selective neck dissections depending on the primary site of the tumour, type of tumour and the characteristic features of the metastases themselves. A search of the literature on neck lymph nodes and neck dissections, on the internet and in old publications, not available in the electronic media, has been carried out. Using this as the basis, we arranged, in sequence, the dates of various landmarks in the treatment of head and neck cancer related to neck dissections to emphasize the overall process of evolution of neck dissection thereby showing how the field of head and neck surgery has travelled a long way from radical neck dissection to its modifications and further to selective neck dissections and sentinel node biopsies. The present understanding of the patterns of neck metastases enables us not only to adequately treat the neck metastases, but also to diagnose metastases from unknown primaries. Therefore, depending on the site of the primary tumour, it is now easy to predict the most probable route of metastatic spread and vice versa. This has enabled us to adopt modified and selective neck dissections which have ultimately led to a dramatic reduction in morbidity and almost eliminated mortality due to neck dissection. In the near future, molecular diagnostics and targeted therapies for treating metastases should be able to further reduce the burden of head and neck cancer.
尽管科学、分子医学和靶向治疗取得了进展,但从选择性颈清扫到扩大根治性颈清扫等不同技术的转移性肿瘤手术治疗,在颈部转移瘤的管理中仍占主要部分。这是因为,到目前为止,对于可切除的颈部转移瘤,没有比手术更有效的治疗方法。由于大多数头颈癌患者死于疾病的局部区域进展,而且绝大多数患者存活时间不足以发生远处转移,因此在这些病例中,颈部淋巴结状态仍然是最重要的单一预后因素。自乔治·华盛顿·克里尔描述根治性颈清扫术以来的100年里,我们现在对颈部转移瘤的生物学和临床行为有了更好的理解。这最终导致了根据肿瘤的原发部位、肿瘤类型和转移瘤本身的特征采用选择性颈清扫的保守方法。我们在互联网上以及电子媒体中没有的旧出版物中搜索了有关颈部淋巴结和颈清扫的文献。以此为基础,我们按顺序排列了与颈清扫相关的头颈癌治疗中各个里程碑的日期,以强调颈清扫术的整体演变过程,从而展示出头颈外科领域从根治性颈清扫术到其改良术,再到选择性颈清扫术和前哨淋巴结活检走过了漫长的道路。目前对颈部转移模式的理解使我们不仅能够充分治疗颈部转移瘤,还能够诊断出原发灶不明的转移瘤。因此,根据原发肿瘤的部位,现在很容易预测最可能的转移途径,反之亦然。这使我们能够采用改良和选择性颈清扫术,最终显著降低了发病率,几乎消除了颈清扫术导致的死亡率。在不久的将来,用于治疗转移瘤的分子诊断和靶向治疗应该能够进一步减轻头颈癌的负担。